Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:30 PM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What class was Peetee? Was he capable of soloing it? If not, then at no point could he have camp ownership. Additionally, if you are not capable of holding the camp solo, then you also could not claim the camp by yourself. If you and Peetee could hold the camp together, your claim on the "time line" would manifest the moment both of you are at the camp and capable of duoing it. If the other group had a presence there before the two of you were ready to take it, then they would have the rights.

It seems like some drama was stirred up, so what is the exact issue you're looking to resolve by asking these questions?

The easiest way to answer these questions is to draw a time line. Whoever had sufficient force present first, AND maintained it until the mob spawned gets the kill. No FTE necessary.
To answer your first question he is a 60 Shaman. He may have been able to solo it...Sufficient force to be sure would have likely been the time the rogue arrived there to help him be sure. But from what I have heard of this it happened after the group had already cleared down to the camp...Hence Peetee wouldn't have invited him back to group when he got there. He would of just soloed it if he believed he was skilled enough to do it.
  #2  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:36 PM
Widan Widan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 559
Default

He already engaged before you joined up with him, and being a 60 shaman he is capable of soloing this mob.

Why do you think you should have a chance to roll on the cloak?
  #3  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:41 PM
tenkakahn tenkakahn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
Default

He invited me back because we killed the PH together
  #4  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:21 PM
big league chew big league chew is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2013
Location: prais, ct
Posts: 522
Default

wheres the killshot wheres the action
no yt no1 care
  #5  
Old 07-05-2013, 02:18 PM
Visual Visual is offline
Fire Giant

Visual's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 751
Default

self incrimination
  #6  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:21 PM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

You lose rights to the camp by camping is my understanding. Must "maintain a presence". You admit yourself you left the camp and lost the presence you 2 had there. Basically Peetee was soloing a mob until you ditched the people you got together to retake the camp. Now obviously Peetee camped back in and had FTE as you say... But if another group (you created) was clearing to the camp I think that shows more intent than someone camping out and in between spawns. You dropping your group to try to get in on the looting was just as bad as Peetee taking the mob after camping back in and seeing another group there.


This makes a tough decision for me easy to make. Thanks for the story and screenshot.
  #7  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:26 PM
tenkakahn tenkakahn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
Default

I don't understand what else did I need besides him looting the cloak then leaving? its too late to add anything else...
  #8  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:28 PM
anotherone anotherone is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 64
Default

was it a guild group you left to rejoin peetee? it doesnt matter at this point, but gd.

dem pixels.
  #9  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:29 PM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

you left your group to join with him AFTER he engaged?

just because your in the same group doesn't mean you have any right, the group that tried to ks him had no right and they helped just as much as you.

If my group is at camp a and im omw to it and happen to kill a named theres no way im going to let them roll on it just because we share a chat channel...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
  #10  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:43 PM
tenkakahn tenkakahn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
Default

I get it sorry i took a long break from the game so if anyone is cape able of soloing the monster they are entitled to be able to loot the item and drop group because they could have soloed it i understand now thanks for your information!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.