Firepot bound chars in velious??

[Raavak]

Originally Posted by Buellen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and never seen the elusive dragon that supposed to path by their <faydwer>.

Well, faydwer <sic> is often pulled almost as soon as he spawns.

I still used them in Luclin-era (pre-PoK). Hammer to OT, get on boat, levi and horse run to pots. Pretty fast travel for a knight at the time. I think it was when I was farming Underfoot Mushrooms for brewing.

[Sebastionleo]

Ahhh, got it. That's pretty cool, wish I'd been around when kunark released.

[SamwiseRed]

thinks pok books ruined eq, bound at pots [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Striiker]

LOL Estu.. That picture would have given me nose-milk had I been drinking it.

[skorge]

at first my initial feeling was they would decrease in value but that won't happen, they will be worth more...mostly because, like you said, there will be less firepot bound characters once some of the one's bound there decide to bind in velious (for guild's sake - which sucks for them) - firepot bound characters will always be useful to have, even in velious. Lots of people have more than 1 character now, im sure it would be nice to have your non-main bound there. I personally will never bind my shaman anywhere else.

[heartbrand]

I'll be switching my pot bound cleric to velious second it goes live because pots will be worthless to me

[heartbrand]

I just can't see why I will ever return to old world on my cleric when Velious comes out. But I play on red and have like everything in the game from old world.

[Pyrocat]

I'm not going to move my bind, it's awesome having access to all the old world cities + cabilis, and a very easy trip to EC tunnel, where you can find ports to pretty much anywhere.

[Nirgon]

Translocate... aww yiss

[fuark]

The point might be moot if account trading is banned by then