The Destruction of Straightness

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your opinion, as a man who fucks women, about men who fuck men, is irrelevant.

Hey whatever man, I only care about men who have sex with animals.

[Hasbinbad]

or children. or nonconsensually.

[Hasbinbad]

im sure there are other examples, but its only for that kind of stuff that you should ever give a fuck about who someone else is fucking, if it's not you. :P

[Hasbinbad]

actually children and animals both fall under consent

[Eliseus]

lol

[India]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

homosexuality I believe is a nurture, not nature, thing. Many biologists and psychologists agree with me, and against the "gay gene" theory, with thousands of studies to back it up. I will note that scientifically speaking the opposing view does not have the enormous amount of evidence.

If we apply this assumption, then homosexuals (and humanity in general) were far better off when they were forced to conceal their activities. By making it acceptable, we will only increase the population of proclaimed homosexuals.

I'm pretty sure you meant to say that you agree with them, blindly.

The "gay gene" is old news. Here are some updates for you from "the scientific community"

There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles.

And "There are numerous theories about the origins of a person’s sexual orientation. Most scientists today agree that sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors. In most people, sexual orientation is shaped at an early age. There is also considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person’s sexuality.


Open your mind and recognize that there are probably many reasons for a person’s sexual orientation, and the reasons may be different for different people.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by India [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure you meant to say that you agree with them, blindly.

The "gay gene" is old news. Here are some updates for you from "the scientific community"

There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles.

And "There are numerous theories about the origins of a person’s sexual orientation. Most scientists today agree that sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors. In most people, sexual orientation is shaped at an early age. There is also considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person’s sexuality.


Open your mind and recognize that there are probably many reasons for a person’s sexual orientation, and the reasons may be different for different people.

There are many reasons, none the justify them HAVING to choose the same sex though. "But the love man" I'm sorry, but with many recent statistics showing divorce rates and those wanting to even get married etc... It definitely must be the love!

[Ahldagor]

hbb, you know that destroying ideals would start the logic play of dismantling any credence that the shaw quote has with you in your sig.

[quido]

I think Hasbin should get his own thread like Harrison.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hbb, you know that destroying ideals would start the logic play of dismantling any credence that the shaw quote has with you in your sig.

too bad logic is just a theory