![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
i love you for the AC changes!!! <3 <3
__________________
[50 Warrior] Rumzuck Umbatsch (Ogre) <Remedy> [34 Druid] Vito Corleone (Wood Elf) <Europa> [35 Necromancer] Torak (Dark Elf) <Europa> [13 Shadow Knight] Rumzerg (Dark Elf) <Europa> EQEmuLauncher Have your files up to date, switch between servers nice and easy, and more! http://moestaverne.com/ | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or you like that we are trying to fix AC to be more useful? The more feedback we get, the sooner the AC changes will go live, or be adjusted so they can go live. Haynar | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
and the difference is great, the mobs dont hit for their max dmg all the time, but still do once in a while, i didnt test too much yet (only this one test) but so far i like it VERY much! gonna do some more testing on other classes aswell soon.. and of course the lord in uguk had a ghoulbane! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
[50 Warrior] Rumzuck Umbatsch (Ogre) <Remedy> [34 Druid] Vito Corleone (Wood Elf) <Europa> [35 Necromancer] Torak (Dark Elf) <Europa> [13 Shadow Knight] Rumzerg (Dark Elf) <Europa> EQEmuLauncher Have your files up to date, switch between servers nice and easy, and more! http://moestaverne.com/ | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
The AC changes work well. there was a noticeable change from me killing in ecommons with my armor on and than with it off. I killed two pumas with armor and 2 without I then tested this on the actual server there is now a noticeable diffrence ac will block the atack and even lower it. xp thing dunno don't have a orge or halfling sorry
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
I never had a problem with AC on my bard and I do not welcome changes to AC mitigation.
In all likelihood I'm entirely alone in thinking this so you can just delete this post and pretend like there are no dissenters. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
But we are requesting people to try the AC changes and EXP changes to see if there is anything totally messed up with them, or if they are just absolutely out of whack. I am aware the current AC mitigation is off quite a bit for players. I am sorry, but I will not be able to leave your character with poor mitigation, while we upgrade everyone else. So you would have to live with the improvements too. I apologize for not being able to leave your bard in an AC challenged state. Haynar | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Wow my lvl 50 paladin owns now
Great Job GM's! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, I can probably go back to having shitty AC mitigation by just taking off some of my armor or something. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
The ac on the test server works very well, and it's really nice to get more use out of my plate : D Here are my findings. I only tested each AC against one guard, the same blue con guard.
Test server 618 AC = 1, 11, 1, 16, 31, 1, 1, 8, 1, 8, 11, 34, 13, 42, 26, 1, 42, 19, 3, 8 ....................................(Each hit I took) Test server 414 AC = 1, 50, 29, 50, 50, 1, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50 The max damage hit of 50 seems pretty constant at this AC, seems a bit rough. 414 AC = 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 1, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50,50 (second test) The only concern I have is that that is a lot of 50's for still having 400ish AC lol. But if it is suppose to be like that, then im happy that it is working correctly I tested the same mob on the real p1999 server and got the following results. P1999 625 AC = 39, 34, 1, 39, 1, 6, 50, 21, 6, 1, 50, 50, 6, 31, 42, 26, 29, 50, 50 P1999 423 AC = 3, 1, 50, 13, 11, 31, 50, 34, 13, 24, 1, 44, 26, 42, 50, 50, 6, 11 The numbers on p1999 are almost identical, so in my eyes the test server AC gets a big thumbs up. Gonna make corpse runs 2x more fun!
__________________
Kraddok - 49 Barbarian Shaman "almost max level"
Everquest Mysteries http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=231587 | ||
|
Last edited by utenan; 06-26-2010 at 08:56 PM..
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|