![]() |
#1891
|
|||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Your data is invalid because it is irrelevant, and this has already been stated to you multiple times by multiple people. Ignoring the facts will not make them go away hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I am also not sure why your posts would indicate that you think claiming that others have made claims (whether true or not) somehow changes the irrefutable fact that the only data you have provided is not relevant to the context of this discussion and to the challenge Troxx presented to you in it (as has been explained to you multiple times by multiple posters). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||
Last edited by cyxthryth; 09-06-2022 at 07:11 PM..
|
#1892
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#1893
|
|||
|
![]() I'm not a professional but I do a fair bit of programming. I can assure you variables matter and no matter how many times you go over something in your head sometimes things just don't play out the way you think they will. This is why testing is important and you do not test for what happens under a specific condition by doing something different and assuming it'll be the same. Very often it will not and for reasons you can't or didn't think about ahead of time.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
#1894
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
The debate is about Shaman DPS vs. Mage DPS. Both sides made a claim about DPS, and both sides provided evidence backing up the claim. After the data was reviewed, a new claim was made that my data is invalid. That new claim needs evidence, or it remains an unfounded claim. You do not get to just keep claiming "your evidence is wrong" without proof. Otherwise it doesn't matter how much data the other side provides, you can just keep making that argument indefinitely. If you say "your photo was photoshopped!", it is not up to the person who provided the photo to prove it is genuine. That is trying to prove a negative. It is up to the side making the claim that "the photo is photoshopped" to provide evidence showing this is the case.
__________________
Shamwowi Wipesalot (60 SHM) | Bazgek Bonebreaker (60 SK) | Sznake Pliszken (52 MNK) | Laanfear (30 ENC)
Do you have questions about Shaman races? Read my guide: https://wiki.project1999.com/Shamwow...man_Race_Guide Want to see Shaman videos? Check out my youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFU...zEFJVBIH3-jUog | |||
#1895
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
DSM: Nope it's red Everyone: Prove it DSM: Here's a picture of a squirrel Everyone: That isn't evidence for what we were discussing DSM: Prove it
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#1896
|
|||
|
![]() If you're going to make a ridiculous outlandish claim then do it. But be prepared to provide evidence under similar conditions to the topic at hand. Otherwise people can (and should) dismiss your claims as bullshit.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
#1897
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Shamwowi Wipesalot (60 SHM) | Bazgek Bonebreaker (60 SK) | Sznake Pliszken (52 MNK) | Laanfear (30 ENC)
Do you have questions about Shaman races? Read my guide: https://wiki.project1999.com/Shamwow...man_Race_Guide Want to see Shaman videos? Check out my youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFU...zEFJVBIH3-jUog | |||
#1898
|
||||||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The post history is clear and viewable by all hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||||||||
#1899
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
![]() |
|
|