Lenfer of TMO Banned for Dual box

[Aadill]

Originally Posted by Kruel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Young heavy equipment seller son

Your message is too long. Tags may only contain 25 characters.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Kruel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not that i dont agree with you on the 30$ video game but most people spending 300k on a tractor is wrong son. I sell heavy equipment for a living.. most dont spend anywere near that on equipment anymore.

Young heavy equipment seller son

Ah I suppose you're right. I see some combines for 175k-230k around 2008/2009 models.

[Tommy_Wiseau]

the price of your tractor isn't really relevant when you're living on white man's welfare. If you think someone who rakes dirt for a living is able to buy $200k dirt-rakers without government checks you're fooling yourself.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Tommy_Wiseau [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the price of your tractor isn't really relevant when you're living on white man's welfare. If you think someone who rakes dirt for a living is able to buy $200k dirt-rakers without government checks you're fooling yourself.

You have no idea wtf you're talking about.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Tommy_Wiseau [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the price of your tractor isn't really relevant when you're living on white man's welfare. If you think someone who rakes dirt for a living is able to buy $200k dirt-rakers without government checks you're fooling yourself.

Very wrong.

[Tommy_Wiseau]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have no idea wtf you're talking about.

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Very wrong.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Source: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/far...byfarmtype.htm

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Tommy_Wiseau [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Source: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/far...byfarmtype.htm

Let me know when you finish reading that.

[Aadill]

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't "net cash farm income" more or less referring to subsidized revenue payments for cash crops per bushel/barrel/bundle etc and not necessarily government assistance in paying for the equipment as an investment?

[Demetrium]

This thread is a gigantic failure. So the guy was two-boxing and got banned, who the hell even cares? Two-boxing isn't the same as ShowEQ. Yeah, it's against the rules, but it doesn't break any game mechanics like actual cheats and hacks.

Looks like some scumbag who is pretty jealous of TMO is pretty desperate for material to use against them. Try again when you actually have something of substance.

[Tommy_Wiseau]

Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't "net cash farm income" more or less referring to subsidized revenue payments for cash crops per bushel/barrel/bundle etc and not necessarily government assistance in paying for the equipment as an investment?

You're not wrong, but note that the share of subsidies marked as "personal" income is deceptively low compared with the percentage of subsidized income to the business. I can't speak to the particulars of every Republican welfare program in the country, but the stats indicate that there are strings attached to the subsidy which demand the cash be placed back into the business.

These farmers are essentially sharecroppers whose equipment and farming infrastructure is purchased and owned by the government and not considered "personal". Riding a $200k machine uncle sam lent you is not the same as having $200k liquid cash to invest in your business. These people are not impressively wealthy.