If you cant wear a mask for your own selfish reasons.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.

Anyone who denies the Son does not have the Father, but whoever confesses the Son has the Father as well.
-1 John 2:23

Which strangely is correlated to John 2:23-25:

Now while he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, many people saw the signs he was performing and believed in his name. But Jesus would not entrust himself to them, for he knew all people. He did not need any testimony about mankind, for he knew what was in each person.

[Cassawary]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone who denies the Son does not have the Father, but whoever confesses the Son has the Father as well.
-1 John 2:23

that's a dope quotation [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tunabros]

when can i go back outside rip

[Jimjam]

How are those versus designed to be fit together. You’re saying Jesus did not confess himself so is without the father? Interesting. I’m not sure why you’re telling that to some giant forest dinosaur bird in a thread about masks.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How are those versus designed to be fit together. You’re saying Jesus did not confess himself so is without the father? Interesting. I’m not sure why you’re telling that to some giant forest dinosaur bird in a thread about masks.

Magnataress made an appeal to "human decency", thereby positing "human decency" as a concept that exists.

John 2:23-25 clearly states otherwise, as does Wisdom of Solomon chapters 1 and 2, so (s)he is essentially making an appeal towards a concept that cannot be substantiated; and given the sordid history of Humanity's "decency" at work, we're going to have to side with the empirical evidence that it does not.

Christ is "The Word" that God, the being that willed the material plane into existence, uses to make meaning of thought which would otherwise just be a formless incohesive blob, and subsequently using "Word"s without Christ essentially leaves whatever you God-less heathens have to say meaningless.

Quoting words of other godless heathens is thereby meaningless as well, by extension.

So, Provide actual proof; not the words of the Word-less, for they have no potency.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Magnataress made an appeal to "human decency", thereby positing "human decency" as a concept that exists.

John 2:23-25 clearly states otherwise, as does Wisdom of Solomon chapters 1 and 2, so (s)he is essentially making an appeal towards a concept that cannot be substantiated; and given the sordid history of Humanity's "decency" at work, we're going to have to side with the empirical evidence that it does not.

Christ is "The Word" that God, the being that willed the material plane into existence, uses to make meaning of thought which would otherwise just be a formless incohesive blob, and subsequently using "Word"s without Christ essentially leaves whatever you God-less heathens have to say meaningless.

Quoting words of other godless heathens is thereby meaningless as well, by extension.

So, Provide actual proof; not the words of the Word-less, for they have no potency.

Bible ends with the death of the author. Literally. ergo it is God’s explicit will that we interpret the bible how we please.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bible ends with the death of the author. Literally. ergo it is God’s explicit will that we interpret the bible how we please.

Care to provide a quote for that? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Magnataress made an appeal to "human decency", thereby positing "human decency" as a concept that exists.

John 2:23-25 clearly states otherwise, as does Wisdom of Solomon chapters 1 and 2, so (s)he is essentially making an appeal towards a concept that cannot be substantiated; and given the sordid history of Humanity's "decency" at work, we're going to have to side with the empirical evidence that it does not.

Christ is "The Word" that God, the being that willed the material plane into existence, uses to make meaning of thought which would otherwise just be a formless incohesive blob, and subsequently using "Word"s without Christ essentially leaves whatever you God-less heathens have to say meaningless.

Quoting words of other godless heathens is thereby meaningless as well, by extension.

So, Provide actual proof; not the words of the Word-less, for they have no potency.

Srsly though, he didn’t testify as he saw sin was in them, which as you’ve confirmed was removed as part of the death of the author plot, so not really relevant anymore.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Srsly though, he didn’t testify as he saw sin was in them, which as you’ve confirmed was removed as part of the death of the author plot, so not really relevant anymore.

Was removed/expunged for those who believe in him.....only.

Anyone who denies the Christ, denies the Father who sent him, and subsequently falls outside of the sanctuary of God's Grace.

[douglas1999]

Off-topic is simply chugging along as normal; Jesus, politics, trans stuff, covid. Don't question the formula.