![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Now of course obviously the cycle has to start somewhere, and it has to be possible to claim a camp without magically having killed the PH before claiming the camp. Camp claims start when someone claims an unclaimed spawn point. The rules do not say that you need to kill a PH to claim a camp. Hell, they don't even say you need to be next to Hadden's spawn point: Quote:
__________________
Loramin Frostseer <Anonymous>, Hetch<Anonymous>, Tecla <Kingdom>, ... Check out the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I can see the point Jimjam is trying to make. Hadden is much more like Sir Lucan than some other random named with a PH. They are both guaranteed set time spawns that spawn outdoors with no PH that people get the timer for and come back later.
The several times I killed Lucan I intentionally left Jentry up to ToT him. No one ever tried to race me for FTE but according to the rules that I never saw publicly stated until 2018 I had no claim to the camp because I wasn't killing Jentry. It's a dick move to KS Hadden when someone has been sitting there but it's also a dick move to KS Lucan if someone is sitting there but not killing the guards, yet that's the rule. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Jimjam + aaezil are correct. Except I don't think that rule is bad, it makes perfect sense. Think of how easily the boxers would be able to claim camps otherwise.
Quote:
If you go somewhere that is uncamped and kill the mob(s), then the camp is yours. You have in fact now killed the PH - the mob(s) you just killed are the PH for the next. By contrast, if you show up somewhere that is uncamped but you just AFK (or if it's a solo spawn with no nearby mobs with which to establish a camp), the camp is not yours. That would be a First-to-Engage situation. Also think about raids for example. It doesn't matter which guild sits in front of a dragon first, it's whoever engages first.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Taranys - 60 Iksar Shaman
Eladrial - 60 Half Elf Ranger Izaria - 60 Human Shadow Knight | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
What a bunch of baseless, shallow, specious sophistry.
FTE? Killing Axe or the previous Hadden? Baseless idiocy. This was a clear ks. It's like some people just want to argue. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Any time I want to come back to P1999 I just come read threads like these.
Thank you all for sacrificing your positions on the human dominance hierarchy to show me the right way | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Its a discussion forum. An argument is a coherent series of statements, using opinion derived from evidence to support a position. Forum is being used as intended.
For what it's worth, I agree cycling Axe to secure Hadden would be rediculous, but I think the same of killing Brother Jentry to secure Lucan. It was a flippant suggestion. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
STFU Jimjam
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are three mechanics by which you can acquire a camp; killing PHers, clearing the room if there isn't a ph or inheriting it through a hand off. I'm sorry if my position is so upsetting to you it causes you to lose your composure. | |||
|
Last edited by Jimjam; 01-26-2019 at 07:03 PM..
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|