Scout Roll Agreement 2017

[Fasttimes]

Hit me up. Racks on racks on racks. 24k x4 scout. Buying all day .

[Robbintha Hood]

Originally Posted by Perissh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Player made agreement cant be made if not all players agree to it. That defeats the whole purpose. If a player made agreement is something that a couple of people can agree on and force everyone else to adhere to, I'm going to start posting some insane agreements and have my friends agree to them.

East Commons Tunnel cannot be used to sell items going forward. All auctions must now be done inside of High Keep in the room behind the banker.

If Scout is gonna be roll a mob, then I support the removal of EC Tunnel Auctions in favor of Highkeep behind the banker. Also, I also vote that Fear Golems and Traknon be on roll between racing guilds. You see where Perissh getting at with this about Scout roll? Its a f*cking stupid rule change. Plain and simple.

[Crashking]

Originally Posted by Perissh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Player made agreement cant be made if not all players agree to it. That defeats the whole purpose. If a player made agreement is something that a couple of people can agree on and force everyone else to adhere to, I'm going to start posting some insane agreements and have my friends agree to them.

East Commons Tunnel cannot be used to sell items going forward. All auctions must now be done inside of High Keep in the room behind the banker.

I just have to say 2 things here.... 1: OMG 20 pages already and Goblins of Highkeep post only went 13. And 2: While Highkeep would be nice spot to do trade with since banker is right there and its basically middle of the continent I can only see Highkeep go to hell due to all the people logged in thus causing more lag then needed for the zone -- So much for paradise.

But back to the OP: Um this isn't a discussion.. its a POLL - ie a place to vote if you agree or disagree as those are the only choices. Now there could have been another thread that was more of a discussion thread. So based on what I see, I have to say disagree... Please point out the discussion thread and I'd be happy to discuss other view points. As for selling of MQ's... this should be outlawed period, earn your coppers the old fashion way.... GRIND for them. The whole economy of selling things just makes things worse for the game overall -- it certainly would be a whole different game if you could only sell to or buy from vendor NPCs -- no more 40k+ items, you toon would just have to earn things maybe actually go to the camp and kill for it, sucker others into being social and helping out. No more people coming by to farm something hoping to pawn it off to someone else and instead the spot might actually be open to give another person a shot at said item.

Also as for OP.. hate to say but this is 99 Blue the EQ experiment to 99 Green where GM's might have different rulesets or other things implemented to avoid major issues, like Epic MQ sales where lvl 1 rouges could have it, oh wait they did something about that already. Maybe Rogean/Nilbog will make up a rule against pick pocketing mobs from a camped area ... hmm Don't see anyone discussing that one or bolstering to have something done about it, I mean hey isn't the reason someone normally camps something is for the loots.

Anyway.. where was that discussion thread again regarding ways to deal with scout... eh maybe I should just get back to the game so I can have the right faction to do things when I want to do them.

[Freakish]

Originally Posted by teija [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have no stake in this issue but it seems OPs thread died with him trying to change the current rules in place. This thread rly means nothing tho, Even if some agreed to these terms you can not shove this down the throats of people that do not agree with your changes, People also have 0 obligation to follow the current agreement also.The only thing I see this thread doing is dividing people and eventually making this a clickfest again due to disagreements in these rules.

I can summarize this whole paragraph into a single sentence.

"Don't rock the boat."

[loramin]

Originally Posted by teija [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Loramin's compromise seems like a good middle ground tho people can just lie.

In theory they can't though. Let's say Bob agrees to the roll conditions, and says he's rolling for himself, then he wins the roll and gets help with the fight. Then Bob gives the loot rights to someone else (friend, guildmate, person who gave him plat, whoever). If anyone sees it happen they can petition.

Since Bob entered in to a player made agreement when he told everyone "please help me this is for myself", and since the staff has stated (I believe) that they will enforce such agreements ... plus since there's a general rule about not defrauding people (and Bob essentially defrauded everyone who helped him), in theory he would suffer consequences.

[Fasttimes]

All that matters is the electoral vote anyways.