Rate the Staff Here (NO BASHING)

[skarlorn]

why would upost on forums of a game u haven't played in years

[bigjerry]

im part of a outreach program i got a grant for this

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by EverquestPurist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

amelinda + derubael

do NOT violate the rules of the law.

which is your favorite? and your least?

EXPLAIN UR REASONING.

[Sodors Finest Poster]

What is Redwjamz doing these days?

[Loke]

Nilbog - 5/5, by far the best thing to happen to this server. I haven't spoken to him in years, and even then it was only a couple times when we needed to escalate an issue to his level of decision making, but his IDGAF attitude always kept him extremely fair and objective. Seriously not trying to be a sycophant, but we should all be thankful someone like him is part of the leadership of this project.

Rogean - 4/5, I think Rogean is kind of in the same boat as Nilbog, but the fact that he had to interact with the player base so much more than Nilbog made his job harder. If he could have just maintained the server and ignored the players like Nilbog seemed to do most of the time he'd probably be 5/5. Loses a point because he inevitably got buddy-buddy with some players and that always creates a conflict of interest. Even so, in almost all my dealings with him when I was handling that sort of stuff for DA, I always felt he tried to remain objective and fair in his rulings. Him stepping back and taking a smaller role in GM issues has been a bad thing for the server imo.

Hobby - 4/5, not a lot to say about Hobby, which is a good thing. Occasionally he got shit from both sides accusing him of playing favorites, but seemed pretty objective for the most part. No drama or scandals that I'm aware of (aside from the claim that he was Virtuosos, which I don't know if it is true).

Uthgaard & Cyrius - 3/5, even though both of these guys eventually snapped, both were decent for the majority of their time GMing. Uthgaard loses points because he jumped to conclusions and would often take someone telling their side of the story as some sort of personal attack on his authority, and Cyrius loses points becaue Uu had a big anti-raid guild bias. Uu also loses points because of his ridiculous decision to ban 7 of the 9 DA officers (only Appollo and myself didn't get suspended). That lasted all of a couple hours before big Rogean stepped in and ended Cyrius's power trip.

Not going to comment on any others since current staff apparently can't handle criticism and only want to hear the praise of sycophants. I think punishing people for criticizing GMs has been a negative influence on the server. Sure, we lost a few GMs because they got sick of the criticism, but those people needed to go anyway (mainly Cyrius and Uthgaard). Both were good GMs for awhile, but clearly got burned out and started being unreasonable as a result.

[AzzarTheGod]

Lmao

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TODAYS' CSR FIRE WARNING: HIGH