Dos the Left Hate Pride? - Page 19

Nihilist_santa · #**181** 07-08-2016, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auvdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you make the other side look up the evidence themselves instead of presenting it? Yeah, you're a real good debater! What's the "real school" you go to? Charter College? Some 2 month online degree?

For the record, I know the case. I'm just commenting on your lack of debate skills. And don't even try to tell me you weren't debating with him. You were.

So you know about the case but wanted to engage in BS like Allaharti? Yeah im real serious bro got me a timer and score cards and everything.

Nihilist_santa · #**182** 07-08-2016, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

god you people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

Haha ty Raev. Allaharti has yet to be able to find any information about this.

Nihilist_santa · #**183** 07-08-2016, 01:20 PM

The case is terrible and shows the lengths that people went to to prove their view of malleable gender. It was bad science but much can be drawn from it. Like I said we wont get anything like that again until this new batch starts offing themselves.

Archalen · #**184** 07-08-2016, 01:21 PM

I'm familiar with the case. It only shows that someone who "identifies" as a male wants that identity to be realized and will become suicidal if people tell him to act a different way. Any other conclusions drawn are unscientific and fallacious.

Edit: not even the above is "proved" by the study, but it's a plausible conclusion. There may be other conclusions that fit the data. It's one case so if you are familiar with the sciences you won't use it to try and draw conclusions. Rather use it as a hypothesis generating case-study because of its limited "n" and scope.

Alarti0001 · #**185** 07-08-2016, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reposting and calling you names because that wins debates.

Buffoon!

The debate is already won. The names are just for my personal satisfaction they have nothing to do with the argument at hand.

Alarti0001 · #**186** 07-08-2016, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha ty Raev. Allaharti has yet to be able to find any information about this.

No I said I found opinion pieces not scientific studies... which you claimed was your evidence. I was very clear on this.

Again, I'm not saying the study doesn't exist only that I can't find it... and it seems you can't either.

http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/arti...ticleid=518304

This is the closest thing I could find and its just a abstract in front of a pay wall.

Nihilist_santa · #**187** 07-08-2016, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archalen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm familiar with the case. It only shows that someone who "identifies" as a male wants that identity to be realized and will become suicidal if people tell him to act a different way. Any other conclusions drawn are unscientific and fallacious.

The only thing it shows is that Allaharti's claim that gender is learned behavior based on culture is wrong.

Nihilist_santa · #**188** 07-08-2016, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No I said I found opinion pieces not scientific studies... which you claimed was your evidence. I was very clear on this.

Wiggling are we? Other people here have already stated they are familiar with the case. Nice spin though.

maskedmelon · #**189** 07-08-2016, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The debate is already won. The names are just for my personal satisfaction they have nothing to do with the argument at hand.

I was mistaken then, thank you ^^

Alarti0001 · #**190** 07-08-2016, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wiggling are we? Other people here have already stated they are familiar with the case. Nice spin though.

I'm familiar with the story of Noah. It's anecdotal. Because there is a story of Noah doesn't mean its true. Familiarity has nothing to do with anything I never said the case doesn't exist. I just want to see the science. Can you find it... otherwise I have to attribute your words as personal opinion and not fact.