Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 08-08-2015, 04:57 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
srs question,

why do you think that a new pvp server would end up any different than the current pvp server after a year?
With the same ruleset and playerbase, I believe a new pvp server would result in the same outcome, yes.


Personally, I'm a fan of hardcoded teams, item loot (at least classic->Kunark), and .. really, the best mechanics of the pvp servers.

Whether a new server is made or not, do not put stock into a wipe. Characters are not wiped on p99 servers. Whether they are merged, put into stasis, or whatever, do not expect a wipe.
  #182  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:00 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the same ruleset and playerbase, I believe a new pvp server would result in the same outcome, yes.


Personally, I'm a fan of hardcoded teams, item loot (at least classic->Kunark), and .. really, the best mechanics of the pvp servers.

Whether a new server is made or not, do not put stock into a wipe. Characters are not wiped on p99 servers. Whether they are merged, put into stasis, or whatever, do not expect a wipe.
what ever the opposite of cringe is, that is what is on my face

pras
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #183  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:08 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the same ruleset and playerbase, I believe a new pvp server would result in the same outcome, yes.


Personally, I'm a fan of hardcoded teams, item loot (at least classic->Kunark), and .. really, the best mechanics of the pvp servers.

Whether a new server is made or not, do not put stock into a wipe. Characters are not wiped on p99 servers. Whether they are merged, put into stasis, or whatever, do not expect a wipe.
Teams doesnt work cuz then youd have empire or zerg of the day rolling in one faction, creating a bunch of people who roll on their faction for the winning team and... the poor fuckers who roll something else. You end up with exactly the situation we have right now, but people cant break away and start their own team from the dominant faction. I have not read one single post so far that tries to argument why this isnt the likely outcome of hardcoded teams.
  #184  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:17 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

Eventually it will always be in a situation like this. This is why we want a server that cycles. Nobody cares about hoarding pixels on 15 year old elf sim forever except for psychopaths and druggies. Give people who actually play this for fun a server that wipes. You can even change the ruleset each time. Hard-coded teams would be fun as hell for at least a year.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #185  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:24 PM
Snapple Snapple is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bensonhurst, Brooklyn
Posts: 244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the same ruleset and playerbase, I believe a new pvp server would result in the same outcome, yes.


Personally, I'm a fan of hardcoded teams, item loot (at least classic->Kunark), and .. really, the best mechanics of the pvp servers.

Whether a new server is made or not, do not put stock into a wipe. Characters are not wiped on p99 servers. Whether they are merged, put into stasis, or whatever, do not expect a wipe.
how much work would be involved with opening up a new discord server while we wait for something like a TEAMS based one? Keep it real simple by keeping a hands off approach to GM'ing when it comes to the discord server since its permadeath anyway. Anything goes - 1 item loot and permadeath.
  #186  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:26 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

damn you ames. something like this would make me log back in. fuck bro dat discord server would be the shit.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #187  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:35 PM
Telron Telron is offline
Fire Giant

Telron's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 560
Default

I never played on a discord server. Sounds fun. I am assuming the permadeath is PVP only? Otherwise some content would be impossible without forcing someone to reroll every time.

I am OK with permadeath though. More time spent PVPing = )
  #188  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:35 PM
NegaStoat NegaStoat is offline
Fire Giant

NegaStoat's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 781
Default

Serious question. The old version of teams with good / neutral / evil didn't work out so well on Live servers for obvious reasons, a huge one being the remote safe leveling of Iksar in their zones and Evils having the OT hammer for raid mobilizing. A later version had teams based off of Religions likewise grouped with good / neutral / evil which had funky things like evil side having Bards (worship Rallos Zek), etc.

With a lot of theorycrafters in the house, what would be the best version of teams (at least 3 teams, minimum) and what evidence would back up your proposed version?
  #189  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:36 PM
knix knix is offline
Sarnak

knix's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
people like jinger ruin this community by baiting people into attacking them and then petitioning them

the sad part is, sirken actually suspends people over bullshit like this

LNS means you loot your corpse and immediately get out of the zone

it doesn't mean buff yourself, med to full, and wait 10 minutes for DA to refresh
I didn't bait you, quit lying. I was there under 2 min before you started encouraging your team , I was there for under 5 when i was pvp attacked.
__________________
Let go of what doesn't make you happy. -- going to try to listen to my own advice. See you around but on break for now. 01/31/2016 Told you IB was pieces of shit.
  #190  
Old 08-08-2015, 05:52 PM
Systolic Systolic is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knix [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I didn't bait you, quit lying. I was there under 2 min before you started encouraging your team , I was there for under 5 when i was pvp attacked.
I just want to point out that members of empire's corpses were camped at the bridge that day too. multiple LNS violations were committed, and I know for a fact, being the recipient of one that it was done by TMO.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.