![]() |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
Quote:
We (BDA) and we (the FAP, yeah that's what we call it) didn't blackball GT. IF TMO was going to try to assist GT in their growth and raid capability - why not help them kill some Class C mobs, train them up so they can immediately enter the competitive class as they wanted to? As much as Class C says we shouldn't talk about Class C because we don't know the truths, you shouldn't be talking about Class R because you don't know the truths either. Quote:
Listen, I'm not a huge vocal "fuck TMO" guy - I do not agree with many views that much of your guild has, but that doesn't mean they are of less value than my personal views, or for that matter Chest's views. Chest feels disrespected by Sirken because he was told an issue was handled, closed, done - and then BDA was punished postmortem for it. In that specific instance, it was like the left hand didn't know what the right hand had already done. Chest and Derubael aren't peas-n-carrots like Forrest and Jenny - it's known. So the fact that Derub was driving the "investigation" only added fuel to that fire. The fact that the GM's RECOGNIZED THE CLASS R ROTATION and leveraged a penalty against our Class R assigned mob, when the determined "infraction" was on an FFA spawn, has a greater impact than TMO or IB determining they will "sit one out". We took the punishment, begrudgingly, and still feel it wasn't valid in the first place, as well as wasn't reasonable to have it applied to the PLAYER MADE AGREEMENT that is the Class R rotation. We like the Kool-Aid, we have a ton of interaction both inside and outside the guild. We play other games together, we have RL get togethers and get drunk and badmouth TMO face to face because of the Kool-Aid. All in all, we're a hate-filled machine full of Anti-TMO mongers. Is that the answer you're looking for?
__________________
Anichek Dudeki
Officer, Guild Relations Bregan D'Aerth | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
What he should have done is agreed to Deru's request and dealt with it later in a respectful manner. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Chest first telling his guild to zone in and AE a zone that was already being cleared and Dinacarl training was 2 poor actions that does nothing to promote the health of this server. Dinacarl got punished for his actions that day. While Chest faced no repercussions and got to add something he instigated to his grudge bank. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
True~_~
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I'm so rustled.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will> Manowarr - Druid Blue Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA> Shiroe - 60 Enchanter Manowarr - 60 Druid | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Stop running off the GMs guys seriously
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Peas deru and holy shit it looks like the p99 community needed a vent thread. Ever since I joined rnf has always made work more fun. Lately it's been so sad.
I appreciate every one of you! Now let's take a step forward. Does anyone have ideas on how to make the scene better? What if a collective made a case study thread with petitions and rulings from raid disputes? Would anyone wanna tackle that to help create solid references and a more concrete standard in when/what/how to petition correctly? This would help current and new guilds greatly also avoid frivilous claims. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|