Anita Sarkeesian

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

theyre just a bunch of nerds, its not fucking enron.

if your mad about games, be mad that sony and micorsoft suck so bad

Not a ton to do with them. Blame a stagnant industry about to collapse. Publishers have fallen into "blockbuster or nothing" trap. They could be making a ton on polish and support of humans who.male fin interesting things with the medium. Comic books do thesame way. Its like we live in a world now where "good" doesnt exist in leu for "epic epic epic of epic".


Lets make a first person shooter with brown shit everywhere. I got sick of that shit after the first Resistance game.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

theyre just a bunch of nerds, its not fucking enron.

if your mad about games, be mad that sony and micorsoft suck so bad

Tell that to Anita Sarkeesian then she's the one pissed off at games and the industry as a whole. Nobody involved gamergate is actively showing anger towards games themselves, they are mad at gaming journalism the fact that gaming in general is terrible is a separate issue entirely and fixing it wouldn't fix gaming journalism one bit because development and journalism are completely unrelated...


...unless a dev sleeps with a journalist to gain recognition which is the whole goddamn point.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...unless a dev sleeps with a journalist to gain recognition which is the whole goddamn point.

you realise the ratio of male/female devs is not like...

this math does not add up, do you think game devs are a bunch of gay orgies?

you guys are cute.. settle down.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you realize that what you just said makes absolutely no fucking sense?

What it means is, in order to affect the market by having sex with a game reviwer you would have to fuck like 50 different people... 1, 2, 10 reviews do not make a game successful.

the logic behind gamer gate is so fucking stupid.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The logic behind your defense of the situation is the only stupid thing here. This can easily be looked at as a man exploiting his position of perceived power over woman in the industry.

The entire situation trivializes and hurts women in the industry, I know you are having a hard time understanding that but it's the truth. I know you think this is just a bash fest on some poor purple haired girl that nobody loves. It's not, it's people who care about games being pissed off by scummy behavior and dishonest journalism.

If the guy had any integrity he would have passed the review off to someone else, but he didn't and that's why this is happening.

OK you are talking about ONE instance that you have no personal connection to and made up a bunch of stuff in your head based off of misinformation on forums...

anyway, one instance, didnt even happen the way you think it did... hardly a fucking watergate situation.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you realise the ratio of male/female devs is not like...

this math does not add up, do you think game devs are a bunch of gay orgies?

you guys are cute.. settle down.

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you realize that what you just said makes absolutely no fucking sense?

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh yeah just a bunch of nerds

why are you even commenting on it you fucking dipshit?

The dude ruins days. Didn't you know?

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh yeah just a bunch of nerds

why are you even commenting on it you fucking dipshit?

lol settle down, wat ur prob?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by myriverse [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's absurd. The burden of proof is on the one making the allegation. Until proven otherwise, one must assume she spent the money as intended. Otherwise, we'd be living under a "guilty until proven innocent" system.

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You clearly don't even understand what is going on.

Originally Posted by P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Someone, regardless of the number of people involved, gives you money to provide a product/service. People start to say hey, you aren't providing the service that you said you were going to provide. The burden of proof lies on YOU as that provider to maintain your integrity by either explaining what happened, or reassuring them that their product is still on it's way and being produced. In this case, neither of those has happened, she has sat back and screamed that she's just being picked on for being a girl.

You really think if you did that in any other arena you could just sit back and say "naw, got prof?" in a situation like this and people would be defending you?

At least someone gets it..

She crowdfunded over $150,000 dollars for the express purpose of funding research women in video game media. Since then she has produced five f-i-v-e videos. Go see for yourself at feministfrequencey, they are there.

In four out of five of those videos she sites zero sources, mentions her alleged research zero times.

In the fifth video she links to 5 sources in an attempt to back up a single point in a video trying to make twenty. When you look at those sources you find that 3 of them are unrelated to the point entirely, one of them is research based on debunked psychology about violence in media affecting people (note that this source was published before Anita even crowd-funded in the first place) and the last one is just a link to a feminist blog.

That is one rock of the mountain of evidence. Iruinedyourday poopiepants is the one saying that the information is incorrect and he says it with certainty but won't explain how he came to that conclusion. The burden of proof is on him.

[Misto]

VIDYO GAMES R SEKIST. NEED MOAR BLAK PPL

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]