What's the story on Avatars and Signatures?

[myriverse]

Nothing explicitly NSFW about any avatars or sigs I've seen.

[Xer0]

Im pretty sure things that go beyond suggestive into blatantly sexual are considered NSFW.. it doesnt have to be a moneyshot for someone in the professional world to be like "wtf is that about". Scantily clad women making suggestive motions will do the trick just fine.

Mind you he never explicitly stated no nudity or hardcore pornography.. his words were to keep things work-safe. If he wanted no porn/nudity specifically he would say no porn/nudity. NSFW is pretty well generally understood by well adjusted adults the internet over to include evocative and suggestive images.

[Swish]

Rule lawyering on sigs now, o hai P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daldaen]

Should just ban Sigs and Avatars FTW.

[whitebandit]

Safe for work is SUPER subjective.. My job will tolerate even the worst of the RNF section so i have absolutely No questions about how SFW the signatures i see are.

IE.. OP get a better job :-p

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Xer0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im pretty sure things that go beyond suggestive into blatantly sexual are considered NSFW.. it doesnt have to be a moneyshot for someone in the professional world to be like "wtf is that about". Scantily clad women making suggestive motions will do the trick just fine.

Mind you he never explicitly stated no nudity or hardcore pornography.. his words were to keep things work-safe. If he wanted no porn/nudity specifically he would say no porn/nudity. NSFW is pretty well generally understood by well adjusted adults the internet over to include evocative and suggestive images.

You see worse during the "family hour" on network tv than anything I've seen in a avatar or sig on these boards.

[Gaffin 7.0]

pity reply

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Should just ban Sigs and Avatars FTW.

Why though? You just disable yours and leave the rest of us to enjoy them.

[Kayso]

Originally Posted by whitebandit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Safe for work is SUPER subjective.. My job will tolerate even the worst of the RNF section so i have absolutely No questions about how SFW the signatures i see are.

IE.. OP get a better job :-p

As stupid as they are, I get the "quit wasting time at your job" comments. Winning at EQ usually entails punching the clock at a job a monkey can do - if one is actually employed to begin with. I'm guessing most here don't understand what it is to hold a professional position where you're judged on your overall performance and accomplishment of goals and not how many Big Macs you can make in an hour.

But I've got to know what kind of job you have that would tolerate RnF and also qualifies as being "better" than OPs job. Tattoo artist? Do you get to wear flip-flops to your work?

[webrunner5]

I really doubt many people on here even HAVE a job other than going to the mailbox for their welfare check the way this thread is going. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]