|
|
|
|
#1
05-09-2013, 10:41 PM
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I'd say, if they didn't specify that it was in god time, then why the fuck would any rational person say that it was in god time? Obviously it is supposed to mean exactly what the fuck it says, regular fucking days.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#3
05-09-2013, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
05-09-2013, 11:14 PM
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#5
05-10-2013, 03:53 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
05-10-2013, 03:36 AM
|
|||
|
Well said Harrison.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
05-10-2013, 06:20 AM
|
||||
|
Nocturne, I responded with trololol because at this point I am convinced you are a troll.
I back this up with the fact that you just pull shit out of your ass like most other trolls on this board do. When did god create dinosaurs? and did they live in the same time frame with humans? if they did, why are there no 20 million year old human fossils. Also, since the bible is pretty damn specific on when god created what on which day, why were the dinosaurs not mentioned in the beginning of the bible, and also, again, did they live together with humans? Creationist are so ridiculous to me, because they claim theres no evidence to back up evolution or anything like it, but instead are inclined to say that god created the earth, its only several thousand years old, dinosaurs lived with humans blah blah. And then occasionally we'll find one like you, who rewrites the bible to fit his own purpose, and is so unbelievably thick headed that they can't see they're digging themselves into a hole with every argument. You really are sculpting shit over there, huh? I love how your response claims you gave the "correct" answer. Please do share with me where the bible says there were two 'species' of human. Give us the exact passage so we can go read what you interpret is the answer. See, if I went by your 'logic' I can almost guarantee i could spin the bible to support whatever the fuck I wanted. That's the funny thing about interpretation, it's subjective. What YOU say is happening in the bible is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what the next guy is going to say happened in the bible (and, by the way, among your faith your opinion on the things your claiming to be true is extremely unpopular. Basically, you're on the outside of your own beliefs). Essentially what you are telling us is fact is just your own thoughts on how a 2000 year old text describes how the world was created 2billion years ago. How you can't see the fallacy in this is beyond me. But like rhambuk keeps telling me, creationists and bible thumpers don't have 'reason' or 'logic'. They have religion (not faith, mind you, if you had faith you might actually come across as intelligent or wise), and that religion completely blinds them to anything that doesn't follow their line of thinking. They even take their own religious text and bend it to fit how they think it should read. You're a complete joke, and have no ground left to stand on based on your posts. Its devolved from a semi-intelligent discussion of evolution vs creationism (or should i say religion vs science), into you claiming you have all the answers because of a book that you claim is a giant metaphor, and that nothing should be taken as literal regarding the bible (or excuse me, perhaps just the sections YOU feel are metaphors are not literal). This is just stupid. Come back with another 'correct' answer so I can laugh some more and continue to tear apart the garbage wall you consider a defense.
__________________
Having problems running EQ? Please visit the Tech Discussion forum and read my FAQ before posting:
http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=94928 Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
