Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2013, 09:55 AM
Versus Versus is offline
Planar Protector

Versus's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,339
Send a message via AIM to Versus
Default

sigh @ Radditsu.
Keep Crying Wolf And Twisting Information To Suit You.

a) If Invis Pulling Was Fixed, Mobs On Separate Factions Would Still Come Solo, Aka Vp Dragons. (Not Exploit, Classic)
b) stuDy Your Server History Little Buddy, This Was Done To Prevent The Vd GrIefers (Your More Talented Elders) From MeM Blurring Our Dragons Back To Full Hp, Not To Prevent Training.
__________________
Formerly: Phisting Uranus/Violently/Mcbard/Xosire
Phisting Furiously 60 Grandmaster <The Mystical Order>

Kolored on Red.

  #2  
Old 04-18-2013, 10:04 AM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Versus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
sigh @ Radditsu.
Keep Crying Wolf And Twisting Information To Suit You.

a) If Invis Pulling Was Fixed, Mobs On Separate Factions Would Still Come Solo, Aka Vp Dragons. (Not Exploit, Classic)
b) stuDy Your Server History Little Buddy, This Was Done To Prevent The Vd GrIefers (Your More Talented Elders) From MeM Blurring Our Dragons Back To Full Hp, Not To Prevent Training.


A) Yes If arrows worked like classic a SK could pull anything solo anywhere. Doesn't make it a bad idea
B) I guess preventing trains was just a nice little side effect ?
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #3  
Old 04-18-2013, 10:12 AM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncerr 2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol
The resolution on those boobs was such an awesome unintentional side effect.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #4  
Old 04-18-2013, 10:01 AM
Fountree Fountree is offline
Sarnak

Fountree's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 455
Default

Just found this thread and heard about PD last nite. Went immediately to try to find this post but Ecc beat me haha. Why isn't FE addressing this post? Because to me it looks like your guild broke the raid rules in VP and a guild suspension is probably inc.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccezan View Post
Given that the kiting rule has been overruled with this new GM change I have a couple questions about some recent rule changes.

1) Using Eye of Zomm wall glitch to zone in to target / train zone in? Is this still illegal?

2) Regarding VP raiding: Is using ledge in the picture room to fight dragons still illegal? Currently guilds are not allowed to position a dragon on the ledge in the picture room and fight him there due to vague "pathing exploits." Given the change in GM's, and the changes to the AE in zone (now outdoor zone, walls do not block AE), the ledge no longer offers any strategic PVE advantage during the actual fight encounter. Are we allowed to position dragons there to fight now?

Eccezan Heds, Officer of The Mystical Order
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken View Post
patch question people - i dont have much info about the patch respawn stuff. this is more for raid guild interaction so that the staff members dont have to babysit.


Eccezan - 1) yes still illegal. 2) also still illegal. ill talk to Nilbog and Rogean about it though, and if they feel it should be changed, we will change it.
__________________
Hi
  #5  
Old 04-18-2013, 10:03 AM
Fountree Fountree is offline
Sarnak

Fountree's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 455
Default

Radditsu: see my last post. Sirken specifically talks about ledge pulling there lol there's no doubt that it's clear. Keep ignoring.
__________________
Hi
  #6  
Old 04-18-2013, 11:08 AM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

More bitching

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...Ledge+amelinda


Amelinda:

VP is a non GM intervention zone as far as raid interference goes.

It doesn't give you a pass for exploiting or for trivializing raid content.

nice try though.

If you think i'm being unfair then please feel free to PM nilbog and/or rogean. and / or myself.

however i can tell you all that sitting here in public hurling insults and being disrespectful just doesn't give me the warm fuzzy feeling of "Gee, you are right"

Sooo quit putting words in my mouth. and re-read what i said.
__________________



If pathing dragons through walls to avoid adds is "exploiting" (hint: it is) or trivializing raid content (hint: it is). Then every VP capable guild has been exploiting for at least a year. Phara dar ping pongs down and ports herself through a wall to zone in, or even to ledge. Nothing has been done in either TMO's case or FE's case. If previous (amelinda's) rules were being enforced at least one of these should have been a suspension/public admonishment by GM's.

If pathing is hard to deal with, and dragon/large mob pathing seems a little wonky on the server, why not "test" Dozekar's leash on phara dar ^_^.

Personally, every time I am in VP it never passes the "Feel" test for me. Something about it seems wrong compared to live.

Also I want to note I am not calling any GM out about this. I also am not calling any developer out about this. I would prefer if this could be settled in game. I just want to point some things out for everyone to see just how arbitrary it is in VP
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #7  
Old 04-18-2013, 11:25 AM
Safon Safon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 856
Default

Was Multania voted into FE?
  #8  
Old 04-18-2013, 11:32 AM
Godefroi Godefroi is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Safon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Was Multania voted into FE?
You can ask Qfat since he is our spokesman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #9  
Old 04-18-2013, 11:36 AM
Fountree Fountree is offline
Sarnak

Fountree's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 455
Default

Radditsu still ignoring previous evidence posts that the specific behavior engaged in by FE is not allowed in VP according to Sirken. Keep spinning and ignoring lol.
__________________
Hi
  #10  
Old 04-18-2013, 11:52 AM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Radditsu still ignoring previous evidence posts that the specific behavior engaged in by FE is not allowed in VP according to Sirken. Keep spinning and ignoring lol.
By Definition of Exploiting /Trivializing raid content both are at fault, even if it was not to both's knowledge.

I'm not ignoring, but you are terrible at posting, so I choose to not deal with you.
I'm sorry if it went over your head. Your situational awareness must be pretty low to get it.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.