2012 Presidential Debates

[Slave]

Is it ok to have a man-crush on Biden?

[Lucky]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fascism and communism both utilize socialist-based economies. I vote for capitalism.

That's not a choice in America

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not a choice in America

I find the notion that we, as citizens, are lacking in meaningful choice to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Elections clearly have consequences, and to take such a defeatist view is self-destructive.

Battles are won by armies acting in concert. If an individual trooper despairs and refuses to fire his weapon, he will not aid his side. While it is true that battle may be won without him, he would otherwise add his overall contribution to the aggregate.

You can see demonstrable results of this struggle in every area of your life. The Supreme Court is the most striking example. Do you believe that the justices appointed by each party are interchangeable with one another?

At the end of the day, bemoaning a lack of choice does nothing to increase your access to choice. If anything, despair can be infectious.

[Raavak]

scary

[Lucky]

Well personally I think elections are pointless as I don't need a 'leader' telling me wutdo. Don't need 'lawmakers' playing Moses. But as we are sheep animals, it doesn't matter that much which wolf you pick.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well personally I think elections are pointless as I don't need a 'leader' telling me wutdo. Don't need 'lawmakers' playing Moses. But as we are sheep animals, it doesn't matter that much which wolf you pick.

Are you suggesting that a governmental framework should not exist and that self-regulation, in all aspects, would lead to a freer and more prosperous society?

[Lucky]

You can have a republic without a central leader like the Icelandic Commonwealth of yore, but now we're getting into a lot of bullshit theory. I'm a firm believer in social darwinism via anarchy. Freedom and prosperity are secondary. Could call it anarcho-totalitarianism if you wanted.

All I know is that we are not freer or more prosperous with 'leaders' appropriating our tax funds to bombing 3rd world countries, legislating more tyranny than even Hitler, and bailing out bankrupt financial institutions (not capitalist at all, more corporate communism)

[Reiker000]

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

legislating more tyranny than even Hitler

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obama is worse than Hitler

[Lucky]

Definitely worse

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

now we're getting into a lot of bullshit theory. I'm a firm believer in social darwinism...

I lolled. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]