2-boxing penalty

[SamwiseRed]

RMTers (Nihilum), IM COMIN FOR U N*GGA

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[fishingme]

It's ridiculous to ban any person for 2boxing until others whom were caught cheating are banned (i.e the 365 accounts that were using MQ.) Until that happens there really isn't any room to say who should and shouldn't be banned. (waiting for Secrets to post)

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's ridiculous to ban any person for 2boxing until others whom were caught cheating are banned (i.e the 365 accounts that were using MQ.) Until that happens there really isn't any room to say who should and shouldn't be banned. (waiting for Secrets to post)

fucking glass all their accounts/characters and they will

A) stop cheating/boxing/breaking rules

B) stop playing p99

C) Kill themselves (all of the above)

[Salty]

I play a caster because I for goddamn sure ain't gonna play a melee with shit xp and no box.


Fo rlz




nihilum didn't get shit on for cheating. Holo got shit on for cheating. Amelinda even stated that Holo cheating was a strat stolen from Nih cheating.

So given that jack shit happened to Nih, the very point of this thread is beyond retarded.

Boxers gonna box. It's gonna happen regardless.


A couple people being banned doesn't mean everyone is banned. The percentage of boxers is huge, and it's mostly the people who sit in plane of fear gearing people who are offline. So it's not like Amelinda is going to find the bulk of them.

[Salty]

3 months later, ain't gonna happen filthed

[fiegi]

Heard killjoy/ozer was the first victim of this new policy

[Autotune]

this is just asking for more people to box imo.

Oh, no harsh punishment from boxing you say? Well, i should at least attempt to get away with it.

The worst that happens is i get put back on the same level as everyone else after a week or two...


same thing with MQ and SEQ. The people you screw are the people that don't use them.

[Rutaq]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is just asking for more people to box imo.

Oh, no harsh punishment from boxing you say? Well, i should at least attempt to get away with it.

The worst that happens is i get put back on the same level as everyone else after a week or two...


same thing with MQ and SEQ. The people you screw are the people that don't use them.

I agree. None of things you are talking about can happen to an innocent person. Boxing, MQ, SEQ all require that you knowingly break the rules or give someone your password so they can break the rules for you.

This server is being run for us by a small set of volunteers and anyone that willingly cheats doesn't deserve to be here.

Just Permaban them and move on, in the end more new people will try RED knowing that it has strict rules and that they won't commonly have to compete with players that "cheat" to win.

[Peppers]

Over the holiday weekend Federal R99 Chairwoman Amelinda asked a question that sent a shot across the bow of all fair-minded players who have been playing by the rules.

Just the mention of leniancy has Tuesday's morning pre-market futures soaring in the 2-boxing sector. Jeff Sancy, a 2-box consultant in Chicago said his backlog of 2-box requests has grown 8% over the weekend alone.

(R99X2) the exchange traded 2-box ETF was up 17% pre-market Tuesday morning. Sally Simmons, a trader on the floor of the Chicago Exchange said she noticed a 5-1 ratio in advancers vs. decliners.

New Egg, a leader in online 2-box orders says their inventory will not keep up with the new demand of 2-boxers flooding the market. Expect low inventories to contribute to rising prices and R99X2 stock to explode over it's 50 day moving average.

Mike Lott CEO of Consultants in a Box, says this news sends the message loud and clear that there is no clear leadership at the helm of R99. "The leadership that IS there, seems to be clueless as to the repercussions of it's actions. The boat is rudderless and adrift." Mr. Lott also included that as the R99X2 ETF rises the R99 stock will fall conversely.

[Amelinda]

Originally Posted by Peppers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Over the holiday weekend Federal R99 Chairwoman Amelinda asked a question that sent a shot across the bow of all fair-minded players who have been playing by the rules.

Just the mention of leniancy has Tuesday's morning pre-market futures soaring in the 2-boxing sector. Jeff Sancy, a 2-box consultant in Chicago said his backlog of 2-box requests has grown 8% over the weekend alone.

(R99X2) the exchange traded 2-box ETF was up 17% pre-market Tuesday morning. Sally Simmons, a trader on the floor of the Chicago Exchange said she noticed a 5-1 ratio in advancers vs. decliners.

New Egg, a leader in online 2-box orders says their inventory will not keep up with the new demand of 2-boxers flooding the market. Expect low inventories to contribute to rising prices and R99X2 stock to explode over it's 50 day moving average.

Mike Lott CEO of Consultants in a Box, says this news sends the message loud and clear that there is no clear leadership at the helm of R99. "The leadership that IS there, seems to be clueless as to the repercussions of it's actions. The boat is rudderless and adrift." Mr. Lott also included that as the R99X2 ETF rises the R99 stock will fall conversely.

I thought this post was hilarious. Although I do want to clear up the last paragraph. You idiots (and i use that word as lovingly as possible) seem to think that because i posted this poll that i'm going all strawberries, rainbows and sunshine on people caught 2-boxing. I hate to break it to you. I'm a hard-ass. I don't really believe in leniency at all. I do have a good heart but the chance of be NOT banning someone or just giving a suspension for boxing is very very miniscule. EXTREMELY miniscule. almost non-existant. I think out of the over 100 people i've banned for boxing I have lifted the bans or shown leniency on MAYBE 10 accounts. and that's a liberal estimate.

I always try to give people the benefit of the doubt but we all make choices in life and need to face consequences for our choices. I feel that makes us better people in general. You may feel that is unfair. I feel it is upholding the law. And no - everything is NOT seen in black and white by me but I do expect you all to play by the rules.