![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are reasons to spam taunt, you just want to ignore them for no sensible reason. I prefer to give people all relevant information and let them decide what to do. Hiding information isn't helping anybody. Snaggles never uses taunt at all. In his case, spamming taunt will give him a higher chance of successfully taunting, while also freeing up his focus. 8.3% is better than 0%. Clearly he doesn't want to press taunt for whatever reason, so this is a good middle ground for a user like that. Adding taunt to a macro you are already spamming (if you have one) takes zero effort. For players that don't press taunt and have a spamable macro, taunt spam is a method to increase agro generation for free, without changing existing habits. Something is better than nothing, and some people may not have realized they could do this. You could claim that any player who doesn't use taunt is playing incorrectly. But at the end of the day it's the player's choice as to what they do. Give them the information, and they'll figure out what works best for them. I am not sure why you are so hostile towards discussions. It is very strange.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-29-2023 at 07:52 PM..
| ||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
The simple fact remains as a tank you should be utilizing your tools to the best of your classes ability. There’s simply no reason to spam taunt. And you yourself have admitted it’s not hard to meet the concentration level needed to manual taunt. I am sorry you are wrong and have to come at me and call me hostile and such, it’s quite childish and unfortunately only diminishes your reputation. | |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's too bad about DC. There are patch notes (after our era) about slow first getting moved to disease, then slow having too much aggro and that aggro getting fixed. I assume that's where DC's aggro should be nerfed, and that it's a bug that it's nerfed on p99. | |||
|
Last edited by Vivitron; 11-30-2023 at 02:00 PM..
| ||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
I havent done much grouping with my SK on p99. On live Clinging was my workhorse and seemed to be ok. It's technically just not nearly the hit that an AC debuff is like Shadow Vortex. Even for a warrior that uses proc weapons limited to the "max threshold" the snare whip proc is rather low compared to say a Frostbringer. This is likely a case for people to just gauge as they go, I really doubt most sks can keep aggro primarily using Clinging off a geared rogue at 60. Good to have a few big spell taunts on the bar just incase you need them. Snare/root component is pretty low aggro, the damage is basically threat if it lands. For some reason ac/attk taps or debuffs, slows, blinds, poison counters, if cast all get you to a pretty high level of hate. Formerly disease counters too. It's also why spells like druid swarm or necro/sk blood dots are low threat...they are basically the darkness line w/o the snare component. | |||
|
Last edited by Snaggles; 11-30-2023 at 04:54 PM..
| ||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Let's go back to that 8.33% chance, that stuff had me rolling
| ||
![]() |
|
|