shaman duo

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Parsing is the worst way to gauge mob toughness. Raw logs only thanks.

Yes, please post raw logs so we can double check the parser. It's not difficult to do since you need logging enabled anyway. Logs provide additonal insight since you get more data like what spells you cast, how often you were stunned, number of ripostes, etc.

Things like ripostes will skew the parser's data. Let's say we are testing how much STR affects DPS. If I get 15 ripostes on mob A with 200 STR, and I get 5 ripostes on mob B with 230 STR, that will cause the DPS number on Mob A to more closely resemble the DPS number on mob B. It makes it harder to see how much of a difference STR actually made.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, please post raw logs so we can double check the parser. It's not difficult to do since you need logging enabled anyway. Logs provide additonal insight since you get more data like what spells you cast, how often you were stunned, number of ripostes, etc.

Things like ripostes will skew the parser's data. Let's say we are testing how much STR affects DPS. If I get 15 ripostes on mob A with 200 STR, and I get 5 ripostes on mob B with 230 STR, that will cause the DPS number on Mob A to more closely resemble the DPS number on mob B. It makes it harder to see how much of a difference STR actually made.

This is why I suggest looking at hits not dps. It controls for random factors like random variance in frequency of hits and focuses in on the thing actually being measured.

[Troxx]

He was being sarcastic.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He was being sarcastic.

I know, but he happens to be correct, which is why his sarcasm didn't work as intended. Please post the raw logs!