If Free-Speech falls, we're in trouble

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by GinnasP99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFt74mAX4Ig

2nd best movie ever made, just behind dawn of the dead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Wrekt]

fuck all of you fascists. reading your literal whining about not being able to be a racist terrorist on a private company's platform has been juicy. keep it up.

hope you were in dc on the 6th. fbi coming. lol stupid fascist fucks.

[GinnasP99]

Seek Christ immediately

[HalflingSpergand]

Fbi coming , haha that made me actually laugh

[Jibartik]

Its so rad how the patriots are like "in order to save freedom, we have to take it from the market."

[Danth]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its so rad how the patriots are like "in order to save freedom, we have to take it from the market."

Ma Bell and Edison were eventually required to provide service to everyone whether they liked their customers' politics or not. The local newspaper was NOT required to print editorials it disliked. There's a difference between carriers and publishers. Twitter blocking users for political reasons is distasteful but probably similar to newspapers. I definitely care a whole lot more when an ISP or a web hosting service drops someone it dislikes. Those types of services really ought to be regulated as utilities (ISPs are, to a degree). This is, I think, a case where legislation hasn't caught up with technology. Living history is never as easy as reading it, and it took decades for lawmakers to catch up with the traditional utilities as well.

Danth

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ma Bell and Edison were eventually required to provide service to everyone whether they liked their customers' politics or not. The local newspaper was NOT required to print editorials it disliked. There's a difference between carriers and publishers. Twitter blocking users for political reasons is distasteful but probably similar to newspapers. I definitely care a whole lot more when an ISP or a web hosting service drops someone it dislikes. Those types of services really ought to be regulated as utilities (ISPs are, to a degree). This is, I think, a case where legislation hasn't caught up with technology. Living history is never as easy as reading it, and it took decades for lawmakers to catch up with the traditional utilities as well.

Danth

Those services were regulated to a degree but then the patriots got rid of it lol

You cant make this shit up.

[Danth]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Those services were regulated to a degree but then the patriots got rid of it lol

You cant make this shit up.

Totally agree on that point, it's absurd and all we can do is smack our foreheads and laugh.

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Totally agree on that point, it's absurd and all we can do is smack our foreheads and laugh.

It’s really disingenuous to claim one side of the aisle loves everything it’s sides politicians do. Conservatives and Liberals strongly dislike most things that politicians do, this is the problem. When people then pretend that the opposing side loves everything it’s representatives do. We get a world where conservatives are all nazis and all lefties are commies. Carry on

[Seducio]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YuUBI1XwG0

"The first amendment is first for a reason. The second amendment is just in case the first one doesn't work out."

-Dave Chappelle