Impeaching President Trump

[BallzDeep]

In all reality isn't it very Trump-like to dictate where peoples political affiliations lie and what they stand for? Once you start applying blanket statements that you assume everyone's standpoint on race, politics and where everyone stands on the spectrum. Wouldn't that in turn be racist and bigoted?

[Horza]

Gabbard has very few supporters among actual Democratic primary voters, but her message is amplified by Fox News and other conservative outlets because attacking Hillary Clinton brings in the clicks even still in 2019.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gabbard has very few supporters among actual Democratic primary voters, but her message is amplified by Fox News and other conservative outlets because attacking Hillary Clinton brings in the clicks even in 2019.

Ok but that doesn't justify your position that you are consistency labeling people based on what you deem their political affiliation or philosophical views for them. They will even correct you and you still label people based on your opinion. How is that any different than racism?

You are literally just substituting for race for anything you deem as a negative point of view. You literally think you are inferior to those points of view and your self determination of their philosophy is correct minus the fact that 1000 different people could get 1000 different takeaways from one persons philosophy. That's why you can't utilize 99% of the arguments that you've made here.

Hence why you need to side on caution when labeling or grouping people because that's a very shallow point of view.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok but that doesn't justify your position that you are consistency labeling people based on what you deem their political affiliation or philosophical views for them. They will even correct you and you still label people based on your opinion. How is that any different than racism?

You are literally just substituting for race for anything you deem as a negative point of view. You literally think you are inferior to those points of view and your self determination of their philosophy is correct minus the fact that 1000 different people could get 1000 different takeaways from one persons philosophy. That's why you can't utilize 99% of the arguments that you've made here.

Hence why you need to side on caution when labeling or grouping people because that's a very shallow point of view.

She's a plant just like Jill Stein was.

[Zeboim]

Putting chemicals in the water to make the Frogloks gay

[Rader]

Originally Posted by Zeboim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Putting chemicals in the water to make the Frogloks gay

Clue to Zeboim

The frogloks are gay. They don't need any chemicals.

[Horza]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Horza]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know this might be hard understand but they are equally as bad. If you aren't sticking to the true definition of what someone identifies as, then you are going off your own opinion. That is fine but that just means you are a bigot to thinking your own opinion is constantly inferior to others. Which means you tend to put more faith in your own opinion then peoples own opinion about themselves. I'd rather try to take people at their word then verify. I guess that's just a syndrome of someone who "doesn't really like people" and thinks they want to change the world for people that you have.

I can parse maybe fifty percent of this post. Here you go:

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know this might be hard to understand but they are equally as bad. If you aren't sticking to the true definition of what someone identifies as, then you are going off your own opinion. That is fine but that just means you are a bigot tofor thinking your own opinions is constantly inferiorare superior to those of others. Which means you tend to put more faith in your own opinion thenthan people's own opinion about themselves. I'd rather try to take people at their word and then verify it. I guess that's just a syndrome ofwhere someone who "doesn't really like people" and thinks they want to change the world for people that you have.

[Teppler]

Sadly that’s what happens when you try to have a logical conversation with liberal talking points. It sounds like a non sensical mess.

Imagine explaining to the founding fathers that people can’t decide what gender they are.

[Hoppkins_Wytchfinder]

Dunno, imagine trying to explain to George Washington that slavery is wrong. He probably would be equally as non plussed. I doubt they would understand a lot of the decent changes America has made/is trying to make.