Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2019, 04:46 PM
Teppler Teppler is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,203
Default

Very misleading headline. Tucker is a stand out at Fox News, he isn’t Fox News. For example, I like Tucker a lot. I tend to not like Fox News as a whole.
  #2  
Old 11-27-2019, 04:57 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very misleading headline. Tucker is a stand out at Fox News, he isn’t Fox News. For example, I like Tucker a lot. I tend to not like Fox News as a whole.
What makes the sword better than the sickle?
  #3  
Old 11-27-2019, 05:07 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very misleading headline. Tucker is a stand out at Fox News, he isn’t Fox News. For example, I like Tucker a lot. I tend to not like Fox News as a whole.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok but that doesn't justify your position that you are consistency labeling people based on what you deem their political affiliation or philosophical views for them. They will even correct you and you still label people based on your opinion. How is that any different than racism?

You are literally just substituting for race for anything you deem as a negative point of view. You literally think you are inferior to those points of view and your self determination of their philosophy is correct minus the fact that 1000 different people could get 1000 different takeaways from one persons philosophy. That's why you can't utilize 99% of the arguments that you've made here.

Hence why you need to side on caution when labeling or grouping people because that's a very shallow point of view.
People who label other people based on the political affiliation or philosophical views they have expressed are the real racists. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #4  
Old 11-28-2019, 12:55 AM
BallzDeep BallzDeep is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



People who label other people based on the political affiliation or philosophical views they have expressed are the real racists. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know this might be hard understand but they are equally as bad. If you aren't sticking to the true definition of what someone identifies as, then you are going off your own opinion. That is fine but that just means you are a bigot to thinking your own opinion is constantly inferior to others. Which means you tend to put more faith in your own opinion then peoples own opinion about themselves. I'd rather try to take people at their word then verify. I guess that's just a syndrome of someone who "doesn't really like people" and thinks they want to change the world for people that you have.
  #5  
Old 11-28-2019, 01:15 AM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know this might be hard understand but they are equally as bad. If you aren't sticking to the true definition of what someone identifies as, then you are going off your own opinion. That is fine but that just means you are a bigot to thinking your own opinion is constantly inferior to others. Which means you tend to put more faith in your own opinion then peoples own opinion about themselves. I'd rather try to take people at their word then verify. I guess that's just a syndrome of someone who "doesn't really like people" and thinks they want to change the world for people that you have.
High how are you?
  #6  
Old 11-30-2019, 07:15 AM
mmmroo mmmroo is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very misleading headline. Tucker is a stand out at Fox News, he isn’t Fox News. For example, I like Tucker a lot. I tend to not like Fox News as a whole.
Agreed, Tucker is a rare breed on Fox.
  #7  
Old 11-27-2019, 03:39 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,879
Default

Gabbard is polling at about one percent right now, she isn't the most viable candidate by any metric.
  #8  
Old 11-30-2019, 07:20 AM
mmmroo mmmroo is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Gabbard is polling at about one percent right now, she isn't the most viable candidate by any metric.
Going by polls is laughable, too early young grasshopper. remember when Hilary was polling higher than Trump?

Plus Tulsi Gabbard is a regular on Joe Rogan now, the new way to interview politicians to see if they are scum or not (long form interview). If your not on Rogan you won't win. So far only Tulsi and Bernie have been on. Biden is too old and must drop out asap. Bloomberg might be an issue if the DNC pulls another Corrupt stunt.

But i still think Trump will win in 2020, not because i want him to win but because i know he will win due to DNC corruption and delusion. They refuse to nominate a viable candidate that matches current paradigm of thinking (no more career politicians).
Last edited by mmmroo; 11-30-2019 at 07:29 AM..
  #9  
Old 11-30-2019, 01:42 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmroo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Tulsi Gabbard is a regular on Joe Rogan now, the new way to interview politicians to see if they are scum or not (long form interview). If your not on Rogan you won't win. So far only Tulsi and Bernie have been on.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #10  
Old 11-30-2019, 02:44 PM
DMN DMN is offline
Planar Protector

DMN's Avatar

Join Date: May 2016
Location: My own special hell
Posts: 3,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Did your tits jiggle like that horza?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.