Scout Roll Agreement 2017

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Naethyn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Server staff have said multiple times that if the community comes together and establishes an agreement it will be enforced.

Indeed, but the tricky part is that (as far as I know) they haven't specified what exactly qualifies as "the community coming together".

When the issue is guild/raid related it's reasonable to count guild leader votes, but for something that (potentially) involves all players I suspect they'd want more to see more than just an forum poll (even a 70/30 one) ... especially since I can't remember anything official on P99 ever being settled by a forum poll.

[Legidias]

How is denying someone else loot based on your personal preference not deciding you deserve it more than them exactly?

Regardless of where item ends, they are there, they showed up, they got cov faction.

I do not like that people sell disk loot rights, but they sure as hell should be able to. Fair = you roll for ownership. End. No loot council. Not some rando in forum deciding where loot ends up. What is your definition of fair?

I can't stop you from perceiving something that doesnt make sense, but you should know it really doesnt make sense.

I still go to scout and want the drop. I will not stop someone from selling disk rights and will help them out since its the nice thing to do.

[Check12345]

p99
what a server
what a community

a vote of yes is a vote against aids

[Jimjam]

NBG votes will never make it thru the House of Commons (East division).

[Kesselring]

I imagine people voting no aren't voting no because of the roll but because in your clauses they can't roll for their best buds. Imo a roll is good enough than a clickfest. Let people do what they will with their winnings. If they wanna sell it or give it to a friend maybe they should be allowed. Scout isn't like ring 8 where you gotta do a shitty line of quests. Also it's not as long of a wait. I do see what you're getting at by wanting to keep the rollers to people who actually are looting it but that just means as soon as you win you never come back to help. One guy can show up for his first roll ever and win and then never be seen again helping other people with it. Which happens a lot.

[dbouya]

I voted disagree. Because I disagree with this thread. I don't think this is AT ALL WHATSOEVER what sirken had in mind when he said "player agreements."

You can't refer to this poll for the next year, that's not a binding rule. I do agree though. If I were there I'd agree and then roll. Then I'd keep my word. I disagree with this type of thread though. I don't think it's enforceable, because we don't have 807 sticky thread polls.

In fact maybe I shouldn't've voted because this thread is meaningless.

[kb2005]

Voted no coz I don't think players should be able to post a set of rules and expect it to be binding for everyone on the server. This thread trying to set a bad precedent, IMO.

[aaezil]

Originally Posted by kb2005 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Voted no coz I don't think players should be able to post a set of rules and expect it to be binding for everyone on the server. This thread trying to set a bad precedent, IMO.

I think most sane people echo this sentiment

[danzig]

Gonna guess that the last 20 pages contains a lot of people getting more passionate about this issue than they've felt in years.

[jilena]

Voted no as the initial post is far too angsty. I would be fine with a roll but all of the other unnecessary nonsense needs to be stripped out. Yawn.