Proposition For Raid Rules - Input Requested

[radditsu]

I dig bag limits. Ill see if I can put some thought into a point system. There has to be a threat of running out of targets. Maybe add a carbon credit system if a guild runs open naggy raids etc. Does tmo have data on total spawns per month...outside vp.. on raid mobs?

[radditsu]

Alarti is tmo dkp open to view? I figure yall would have the most accurate over time numbers.

[Argh]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have a simple solution. Lets have FE/IB/TMO agree to no poopsocking, no delayed engages, and to leave up 4 dracos, and 2 naggy/vox/tal/sev/gore/fay/inny in an 8/4 cycle. (50%)

CT/Trak/VP always complete, and the draco that pops with CT always compete.

This is the only really reasonable solution I've seen here. It doesn't require creating a rule book that anyone who wants to raid will have to read through. It leaves the raid scene open for anyone who wants to participate. It is basically TMO/FE/IB agreeing to not engage a number of specific mobs (Isn't this what everyone wanted a week ago?).

Most of the other solutions posted here seem to create an even larger barrier to entry to begin raiding if you're not in a mid tier guild(e.g. BDA/Taken). Also, these more complex solutions(raid points, rotations, etc.) require a ton of oversight. These systems(rotations specifically) also nullify any possibility, albeit small, of public and pick-up raids.

[Argh]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trak/CT/VS should not be on the always compete list, only VS.

Why?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why?

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because that is what I feel (and may be wrong) is what a lot of the contention is; epic cock-blocking. How many Traks and VS kills are had by non-TMO/FEIB?

Didnt you mention you werent guilded earlier?

[Shinko]

god never thought i would almost side with alarti, there are 40% of this server that want to raid 24/7 and the other 60% don't give a fuck and only want to get there epics and stop playing.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Shinko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

god never thought i would almost side with alarti, there are 40% of this server that want to raid 24/7 and the other 60% don't give a fuck and only want to get there epics and stop playing.

40% of the server might fare better on red where they can raid to their heart's content.

[Lammy]

We already know the solution to this problem because it happened on live. We need PoK and Instances are we're gtg for casual mode.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Lammy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We already know the solution to this problem because it happened on live. We need PoK and Instances are we're gtg for casual mode.

Pop didn't have instances silly.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pop didn't have instances silly.

Wasn't PoTimeb an instance?
But ya instances in large part started with LDON