![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Also it is clear what Darwin seems to have believed about human origins after reading the article.
I remain undecided. I would argue for a more evolutionary route. But I dunno. Our history is so incomplete it's hard to say for sure. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
And that doesn't rule out evolution as a natural process even if humans were some how influenced indirectly through some other means... be it cataclysm, divine, aliens, panspermia..
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Runlvlzero,
Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, but Watson and Crick didn't publish the structure of DNA in 1962. Darwin had no clue about the molecular mechanisms of mutation. Modern evolutionary theory is quite different than Darwin's first theories. The important lesson from On the Origins of Species was about natural selection, which is still recognized as a strong force of evolution (the others, typically weaker, being: neutral drift, gene flow, and mutation). Scientists do not dogmatically cling to the words of a 150ish year old book. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
lol
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Also, we all knew that was him. I'm sure it won't be the last we see of him, he's addicted to EC
__________________
Lootenant Dan <Hierophant>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
meltdown occurring here: http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.p...068#post459068
confirmation that he's Sonaa two pages after that
__________________
Escapegoat / Pharmakos / Madriax
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Lootenant Dan <Hierophant>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|