PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Something'Witty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not that anyone cares what I think, but...

Define what constitutes a "raid zone" and expand current Sol B and Permafrost rules to those zones, or get rid of the restrictions. Arguments can be made for both options, but anything in between will just result in confusion and more of these kind of threads...

Now back to forumquest!

How dare you make a perfectly reasonable and logical post. I think that the current FFA rules are out dated now that casters spawn with no mana. You can't bind rush if you spawn with no mana or have no gear as a melee. But if we're going to consider it a logical basis still to keep the FFA raid zone distinction we should consider updating / expanding it to TD / EJ / SF / KC, all zones with raid mobs where binding and out of range players have griefed raids prior.

[p-niner]

Amelinda said no need to honor rule and rebind? Heresay. Where is exhibit A?

Are you just saying fear is an unbindable raid zone or is this documented somewhere? Are you trying to bind yourself right now to verify? SS?

[heartbrand]

Any FFA zone is currently unbindable.

[p-niner]

Lol.....

[Stinkum]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[p-niner]

Out dated cus nilly no longer needs to be in solb and Perma

Expoiters b exploitive.

[heartbrand]

46

[p-niner]

Lets see if HB can single handedly justify exploiting and circumventing GM decisions until 7/1 end date.

[heartbrand]

Where have I justified circumventing gm decisions? Arguing for revisiting the FFA distinction =/= arguing to circumvent rule. Yet in your personal life I bet you smoke weed even though its illegal on the premise that the rationale for the law is illogical.

[Sektor]

48