Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2012, 09:24 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

The biggest benefit of having it on is that it might actually make the server seem active.

EQ is a very lonely game when you are playing here without a guild and killing newbie shit by yourself without seeing another player or line of chat for hours. Having a guild should not be a barrier to entry to play here.
  #2  
Old 03-04-2012, 02:00 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearyxTZ
The biggest benefit of having it on is that it might actually make the server seem active.

EQ is a very lonely game when you are playing here without a guild and killing newbie shit by yourself without seeing another player or line of chat for hours. Having a guild should not be a barrier to entry to play here.
And you don't play either.

This is fucking stupid. People that don't play, crying cause there aren't features they want. And people that do play, crying others don't play, then killing someone naked + AFK at bind 253 times.
  #3  
Old 03-04-2012, 05:13 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And you don't play either.
Yeah I do.


The excuse now is that troll accounts == majority vote for global ooc? Right. Really grasping for straws now...

Not going to argue it further though.

Opt-in global channels would be win-win for both sides.
  #4  
Old 03-04-2012, 06:32 PM
Jirr Jirr is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah I do.


The excuse now is that troll accounts == majority vote for global ooc? Right. Really grasping for straws now...

Not going to argue it further though.

Opt-in global channels would be win-win for both sides.
There is already an opt in channel now its called guild chat.
  #5  
Old 03-04-2012, 06:33 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

Yeah that's really convenient and ideal for a new player.
  #6  
Old 03-04-2012, 05:58 PM
Not_Kazowi Not_Kazowi is offline
Planar Protector

Not_Kazowi's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,473
Send a message via AIM to Not_Kazowi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And you don't play either.

This is fucking stupid. People that don't play, crying cause there aren't features they want. And people that do play, crying others don't play, then killing someone naked + AFK at bind 253 times.
Right, you don't want players coming back to play so you are against ooc and yt? Real smart.

If those were put in server would jump to 200 average pop
__________________
  #7  
Old 03-04-2012, 06:08 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

YT is not conducive to a healthy population. I'm tired of arguing against it since people don't realize that calling me "gay" isn't a real counterargument. I can tolerate OOC, but YT is a horrible idea.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #8  
Old 03-04-2012, 06:16 PM
steaks6 steaks6 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Not_Kazowi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right, you don't want players coming back to play so you are against ooc and yt? Real smart.

If those were put in server would jump to 200 average pop
ahaha sure it would fattie , wouldnt change anything at all

leaderboard might , , , ,

but i dont want either
  #9  
Old 03-03-2012, 10:10 PM
steaks6 steaks6 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 106
Default

waa global ooc

i voted against it because it will just be a shitfest of trolling / pvp smack that will scare away any normal people

hence why its not in , if you need global ooc to make your server successful , its doomed regardless boys and girls
  #10  
Old 03-03-2012, 10:13 PM
Flowz Flowz is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steaks6 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
waa global ooc

i voted against it because it will just be a shitfest of trolling / pvp smack that will scare away any normal people

hence why its not in , if you need global ooc to make your server successful , its doomed regardless boys and girls
We all know u just wanna hang out in Nro because 2hs is 2 hard to raise, wouldn't want the whole server knowing steaks is in nro.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.