Why did I die?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Notice how I said you call them a troll when they get fed up with you? I never said you call them a troll for no reason.

You're trying to pull out the most desperate and sleazy tactics imaginable, but they're all failing, DSM.

So now you admit they were trolling, and thus calling them a troll was justified. The reason why they are trolling is irrelevant to the fact that they are trolling or have a pattern of trolling behavior.

[Gloomlord]

Define "normally". It is normal to insult, mock and harshly dismiss a person who displays a childish inability to concede a point.

You can't expect people to act civil with you. And how many times has this happened across the forums?

Are they expected to be paragons of patience? EverQuest attracts a pretty relaxed and mature audience compared to other games, yet you're still managing to wind up people.

This is a problem involving you. It's time to face facts.

Edit: Another stealth edit meant to "trap me". This is another sign you are a manipulative sociopath. The infamous 4 man caster thread is chock full of people you have called a troll for finally reaching their limit with you. That "dare" fell flat on its face.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Define "normally". It is normal to insult, mock and harshly dismiss a person who displays a childish inability to concede a point.

You can't expect people to act civil with you. And how many times has this happened across the forums?

Are they expected to be paragons of patience? EverQuest attracts a pretty relaxed and mature audience compared to other games, yet you're still managing to wind up people.

This is a problem involving you. It's time to face facts.

As you can see, he cannot even provide one example of me calling someone a troll for no reason.

It is very childish and sad to see that he believes attacking other people he disagrees with is the proper course of action in a debate. This explains why over 80% of his posts look just like this. He doesn't understand how civil conversations work.

[Troxx]

Feeling the need to rely on manually targeting a mob and /con to ensure my FD worked is about as sensible as routinely sticking my hand over the exhaust pipe of my car to ensure I actually turn the engine off.

Sure … it’s a way to make sure my car is indeed actually not still running …

but wtf …

A++ thread
5 star chortle material

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Feeling the need to rely on manually targeting a mob and /con to ensure my FD worked is about as sensible as routinely sticking my hand over the exhaust pipe of my car to ensure I actually turn the engine off.

This analogy makes no sense, because you aren't hurting yourself by using /con lol. You can bind it to a macro or key.

A better analogy is checking if your computer is off by either looking at the power light, or moving your mouse to see if it wakes up. Both methods work fine. You are basically trying to argue people are idiots if they use one method to check if their computer is off instead of the other. It's nonsense. It's ok to admit you didn't know about /con and the unreliable nature of the fallen to the ground message.

[Gloomlord]

Yes, this is why you stealth edit. You completely exposed yourself there.

Look back at my post. I caught onto it.

Troxx humiliating you is the very least you deserve. You're not even honourable in way you conduct yourself.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, this is why you stealth edit. You completely exposed yourself there.

Look back at my post. I caught onto it.

Troxx humiliating you is the very least you deserve. You're not even honourable in way you conduct yourself.

As you can see, he cannot find an example of me calling someone a troll for no reason.

I am not sure what delusional nonsense he is referring to either. Editing a post is not some manipulation tactic. Trolls like yourself and Troxx twist my words, so I need to be sure my message cannot be manipulated by your trolling. That is the only reason why I edit posts.

[Gloomlord]

You edited in "find one example". You quoted me without the edit I made. You then used this as an example that I "couldn't find one example". Now you are projecting your own malevolence onto me.

You stealth edit to trick people (Well, nobody is going to buy it, anyway.). Nothing more.

Should I go through that infamous thread and take out every specific example of where you call people trolls? You kept copy-pasting the same post where people "should ignore the trolls", which consisted of more than 10 people.

"MEGA YIKES!"

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You edited in "find one example". You quoted me without the edit I made. You then used this as an example that I "couldn't find one example". Now you are projecting your own malevolence onto me.

You stealth edit to trick people (Well, nobody is going to buy it, anyway.). Nothing more.

Should I go through that infamous thread and take out every specific example of where you call people trolls? You kept copy-pasting the same post where people "should ignore the trolls", which consisted of more than 10 people.

"MEGA YIKES!"

As you can see, Gloomlord is clearly delusional. He has no evidence to explain why I edit my posts, and is simply making things up to feed his fantasies. His constant attacks on me are a clear explaination as to why I edit my posts. He simply can't see that he is the one in the wrong here.

He still hasn't found a post, because he knows that you can go backwards from the post to see why the posters in question were called trolls.

[Gloomlord]

Who are you talking to, exactly? Nobody is believing you, you realise this?

Also, if your edits somehow were not manipulative, then you need to let people know that you edited. You're a "good man", right?

You can redeem yourself, DSM. Isn't that what you keep telling me?