Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Melee

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2024, 01:11 AM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just reread yourself:



You said 57 chances and 28.5 successes. You are indeed assuming a 50% hit rate, which is fine.

In my previous post, I said you get 100 Epic Fist Swings per 40 IFS swings. The average damage of Epic Fist is 27.

27 * 100 = 2700, which is a 100% hit chance when looking at 100 swings. You need to divide 2700 by 2 and 3820 by 2 if you want to use the 969 number, which is the offhand swings at a 50% hit rate.

If you want to use 2700 and 3820, multiply 969 by 2.

You misread my post, plain and simple.
By successes he wasn't adjusting for hit rate, he was adjusting for offhand swing chance.

I'll put it another way:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
40 * 95.5 = 3820 damage from IFS.

27 * 100 = 2700 damage from Epic Fist.

Using the 48% dual wield rate from the video would be 48 swings from SoS.

34 * 48 = 1632 damage from SoS.

You are looking at 3820 damage from IFS vs 4332 damage from Epic + SoS at 100% hit rate. Most likely the dual wield chance is 50%, but 48% is better for steel-manning the argument.
You forgot that the SoS is slower; 28 delay vs 16 for epic fists. So you need to multiply the 1632 * 16/28 = 933; we are looking at 3820 IFS vs 3633 Epic + SoS.
Last edited by Vivitron; 11-19-2024 at 01:13 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2024, 01:10 AM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 748
Default

57 dual wield chances and 28.5 successes - i.e. actual swings that could hit or miss.

You'll have 57 skill checks against dual wield - once every 2.8 seconds unhasted. 28.5 times dual wield will succeed and you'll actually swing the offhand. At 100% hit rate on swings that's 969 damage.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2024, 01:32 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By successes he wasn't adjusting for hit rate, he was adjusting for offhand swing chance.

I'll put it another way:


You forgot that the SoS is slower; 28 delay vs 16 for epic fists. So you need to multiply the 1632 * 16/28 = 933; we are looking at 3820 IFS vs 3633 Epic + SoS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
57 dual wield chances and 28.5 successes - i.e. actual swings that could hit or miss.

You'll have 57 skill checks against dual wield - once every 2.8 seconds unhasted. 28.5 times dual wield will succeed and you'll actually swing the offhand. At 100% hit rate on swings that's 969 damage.
I think I see the confusion. Monks get a 75% chance to dual wield in terms of skill checks at level 50 if you want to fully break it down like that.

So you have 57 chances and 42 successes with SoS on a Monk. 2700 + 1428 = 4128 at 100% hit rate for Epic Fist + SoS vs 3820 damage from IFS at 100% hit rate.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-19-2024 at 01:36 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2024, 02:12 AM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think I see the confusion. Monks get a 75% chance to dual wield in terms of skill checks at level 50 if you want to fully break it down like that.

So you have 57 chances and 42 successes with SoS on a Monk. 2700 + 1428 = 4128 at 100% hit rate for Epic Fist + SoS vs 3820 damage from IFS at 100% hit rate.
I see. I interpreted you're comment about dual wield rate to be breaking it down like that rather than going off total parsed crushes/punches, although you indeed specified the latter the original parse post.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2024, 02:19 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I see. I interpreted you're comment about dual wield rate to be breaking it down like that rather than going off total parsed crushes/punches, although you indeed specified the latter the original parse post.
Yeah it was my bad for not being clear. I was going off of my parse for the 50% dual wield number. I had 209 main hand swings and 101 offhand swings in the parse, which is basically 50%.

When I saw Bcbrown divide 57 by 2 my brain was still thinking about that. You guys were talking about the actual skill check chance for dual wield, which is 75% for Monks at 50.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2024, 01:54 AM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 748
Default

Lmao you finally got the right result from your napkin math! Given your assumptions I agree with your conclusions. Good job! I'm proud of you!

I'm also glad you came around on the idea that a 2-3 minute parse is insufficiently long to draw any conclusions from.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2024, 02:07 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lmao you finally got the right result from your napkin math! Given your assumptions I agree with your conclusions. Good job! I'm proud of you!

I'm also glad you came around on the idea that a 2-3 minute parse is insufficiently long to draw any conclusions from.
The parse was fine.

At the end of the day the IFS damage alone in the parse was 4883 - 564 punch damage = 4319 2h damage.

If you want to equalize the time, 4999 - 30.67 DPS * 8 seconds = 4754 1h damage.

The parse also shows the Epic Fist + SoS out-performing the IFS without fistweaving.

I would love to see you do a longer parse if you think you'll get a different result. You still have yet to provide any data in this thread.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-19-2024 at 02:11 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2024, 10:40 AM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,504
Default

Hey another question, when soloing as a 52 monk (because we have to care about this) would you rather riposte for 25 damage or 250 damage?

Would you rather hit a necromancer npc for 3x the damage from Banshee Aura or just 1/3rd of the damage?

Better get another napkin to spin imaginary scenarios with!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2024, 11:13 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Better get another napkin to spin imaginary scenarios with!
lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2024, 11:23 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol
Thanks for admitting defeat. You have no data or counter for your position. Glad to see you learned something new!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.