Paris attack thread

[iruinedyourday]

orruar just put me on ignore i hate yo uand dont care what you think so stop quoting me and asking questions youll get nowhere besides the fact you are too fucking stupid to understand one word i have ever posted

[iruinedyourday]

you know how you guy say when you cant win an argument cry racist?

yea you are being that fucking dumb trying to go after my spelling

[Lune]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you know how you guy say when you cant win an argument cry racist?

yea you are being that fucking dumb trying to go after my spelling

Nah I just don't think you should be calling people stupid, and you stopped addressing my points a long time ago.

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is what you guys say "we should turn the middle east into glass and euthanise all thier children - I heard that even moderate Muslims think isis should jihad us"

are you guys extremists? or moderates?

I didn't say we should glass the middle east, nor do I agree we should. That so-called moderate Muslims tend to have healthy support for Sharia is objective fact, and I've posted evidence supporting it. I wouldn't make the assertion that the 'majority' of Muslims support ISIS (though many do), because it simply isn't true. However, the majority of Muslims do support Sharia, which is enough for me to disagree profoundly with the majority of Muslims.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

when you cant win an argument cry racist?

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wish the people that hated me weren't racist shit heads so i could feel bad about it.

[iruinedyourday]

this is what you guys say "we should turn the middle east into glass and euthanise all thier children - I heard that even moderate Muslims think isis should jihad us"

are you guys extremists? or moderates?

[iruinedyourday]

moderate Americans tend to have a healthy support for world war 4 so maybe its you guys that should just stop for a second if you think about it, the KDR is WAY higher on your side of the argument.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[JayN]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

moderate Americans tend to have a healthy support for world war 4 so maybe its you guys that should just stop for a second if you think about it, the KDR is WAY higher on your side of the argument.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I need some of the burger delight w/e the fug it is [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Champion_Standing]

Burger Delight from some god fearing patriots? sign me up

[iruinedyourday]

drugs

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by Kyff [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did you spend the last years? The NSA has these kind of things and still failed to prevent a single attack. I wonder why despite these failures people still think more surveillance would bring better results. It might be a better idea to dissolve this entity and use the free budget to alleviate the lives of arabs.

I don't think you grasp the actual point of surveillance on a global scale, let alone what I'm trying to say. It has little to do with individuals, and everything to do with scientifically refining the media apparatus to get the optimal outcome on the population-scale for those granted access to the data. All the NSA really has at present is vast stores of information; big data science hasn't moved beyond its infancy yet.

"Trying to prevent attacks" is an exceedingly thin justification for the real purpose of the Utah data center. In reality, the only serious mechanism for mass surveillance to improve security is by ensuring greater compliance and contentment with the prevailing social order through the scientific refinement of the psyops and propaganda techniques used to generate that image of society.

As Zuckerberg has said "give me a large enough dataset and I can predict the future". But even this falls short of describing what this power means for the state, who controls enough of the info distribution apparatus that they can use that data to predict and control the future. It's the power of God, granted to sick megalomaniacs, as predicted in pretty much every book of eschatology since humans started thinking about the inevitable outcome of advancing civilization and technology. Our preachers and priests talked about this shit at one time; maybe that's why we've been conditioned to laugh at everything they say, while simultaneously burying ourselves in total ignorance to all but the most superficial aspects of science and naturalism.

Nazis and Soviets had propaganda artists, perhaps of great talent but nonetheless limited to the realm of artistry. Mass psychology and propaganda will become the most revolutionary sciences in human history once we unlock the secrets hidden in the huge troves of data we are accumulating now year-by-year. "Big data" is the future. We're really overdue for a modern 1984/BNW that takes looming technology into account so the average unimaginative pleb can fathom the thousand-foot demon standing over us now. It's the greatest revolution in relations between ruler and serf ever, by far. I can't imagine another technology having larger implications for society until nanomachines and programmable environments.