Rants, Flames, and NSFW - Page 16

Aviann · #**151** 04-30-2015, 02:28 PM

Really the only concern that can cross my mind is understandably we were upset, while understandably Sikorsky tried to act high and mighty because we were upset about something we had no reasoning for happening at the time. It's not hard for us to come up and apologize, especially considering this isn't our box, but it isn't Sikorsky's either and he shouldn't act like a dick when he knows we knew nothing about what was happening.

I hope he's proud of himself for being a prick when it was unnecessary. Still love the rest of you guys.

Glenzig · #**152** 04-30-2015, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

heavy-handed moderation without warning

Is this a violation of your legally binding co tract with Project 1999? Or perhaps it is a civil rights violation. I urge you to seek counsel pursuant to this issue forth with.

kaev · #**153** 04-30-2015, 02:44 PM

LADIEEEEEZZZ AND GENTLEMEN!! Now battling in the center ring for your edification and entertainment we have the RnF Regulars fighting today under the banner of <Entitlement> vs the Righteous Interlopers flying the flag of <Smug>!!!

Who will win this epic battle? Place your bets now!! All windows are open until the bell rings to start the final round!!!

/popcorn

Swish · #**154** 04-30-2015, 02:44 PM

A lot of paladins coming into this thread... rightly or wrongly.

Aviann · #**155** 04-30-2015, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A lot of paladins coming into this thread... rightly or wrongly.

No way to tell if it's right or wrong, yet. Get my drift? Huehuehue

Samoht · #**156** 04-30-2015, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is this a violation of your legally binding co tract with Project 1999? Or perhaps it is a civil rights violation. I urge you to seek counsel pursuant to this issue forth with.

this is just more deflection from the issue. the rules were laid out and clear. the rules were changed without telling anybody. now people are upset. how hard would it have been to simply announce new rules?

FoxxHound · #**157** 04-30-2015, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Troubled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gay rights

I'd like to go digging in Sirkens brown eye. (With gloves ofc)

Eunomia · #**158** 04-30-2015, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is just more deflection from the issue. the rules were laid out and clear. the rules were changed without telling anybody. now people are upset. how hard would it have been to simply announce new rules?

I'm sorry.

Can we move on now?

Villide · #**159** 04-30-2015, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is just more deflection from the issue. the rules were laid out and clear. the rules were changed without telling anybody. now people are upset. how hard would it have been to simply announce new rules?

You still would have pissed and moaned. Just a feeling I'm getting.

Ezalor · #**160** 04-30-2015, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You still would have pissed and moaned. Just a feeling I'm getting.

we're talking about a guy with bolded HYPOCRISY!! in his sig

dude only speaks in hyperbole and feet stamping