![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
If there was no demand for bought and sold pixels, there would be no one interested in stockpiling with the intent to sell. You punish everyone involved, including the sellers. That doesn't mean that RMT goes away. That is in the hands of the community. In other words, RMT, and the bans that result from it, will always be with us. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
The way the most valuable mobs (and therefore, drops) on the server are totally locked down there's only a set group of people (or guilds) that could possibly have the volume of items and platinum required to sustain such "vast demand." Surely then, by your logic, the demand must far outweigh the supply. Therefore one can assume that the SUPPLIERS are in far fewer numbers than the BUYERS, which in turn leads us to the final question: If the staff can "track down and identify 440 accounts involved with RMT" would it not be fair to assume that they should be able to track down these suppliers who are far fewer in number? Browsing some of the RMT sites for fun after this banwave revealed one thing that was very obvious: Just 24 hours after the banwave hit, operations were restored to normal. This means that CLEARLY the supply chain was not hit in any way but instead the buyers received the most punishment; going so far as to BAN accounts that simply traded with and/or received platinum and/or items from RMTers in what SEEMED to be legitimate ingame trades. TLDR: It just doesn't add up. If you can "track 440 accounts involved in RMT" then why can you not track the far fewer number of accounts that are SUPPLYING these RMTers? There can't be that many accounts / players that have 10s of millions of platinum and items banked who can just endlessly supply these large RMT websites with stock -- unless there's some kind of item/plat duping that's going on which is always a possibility as well! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Beam me up! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Pras!
__________________
Gnawlunzs Phrogphry
Master Angler, Baker, Cadger, Drunk "If you can't eat a frog, then eat two." | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Good work brah, when's Velious coming I can't wait!!!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Nobody should have to 'be weary' of who's plat they accept. Saw a comment about refusing people service/goods due to thinking they may have RMT'd. Let the GMs worry about that.
I was a level 1 monk with fungi, rbb, tstaff...w/o RMT. Don't tase me bro.
__________________
Girth Matters (Retired)
50 Ogre Shadow Knight Mugatoo <Center For Ants> 45 Iksar Monk "You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
My lvl 1 rogue epic twink got banned with no RMT. Safe to say it clearly does matter where the money comes from bud. Essentially stolen goods is a crime even if you didn't steal it yourself. Ce la vie. Hats off to all the work Rogean & Co are putting in. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Or #wipeitclean2015.
And spend the next year and a half (of classic timeline) getting ready to release Velious. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|