Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the fundamental difference is that mazam doesn't see this as a raid dispute and he's trying to insulate his guild with as many layers of protection as possible. It was only Dinacarl, it was only Unbrella, there wasn't enough TMO to constitute a raid, etc etc
Mazam is a nice guy, but he's willing to make changes only up to the point where TMO would lose something meaningful. It WAS a raid, in a RAID zone, and my RAID got wiped the fuck out, then TMO leadership laughed it up.
|
Oh boy here comes the semantics, rage, and wild theories. Even the GMs are not going to call what Dinacarl did on his own a raid dispute. Even if it was a raid dispute what did you guys lose that we can compensate to come to an agreement ? I mean we can AoE fear for you a couple times and let you loot the corpses if you feel you lost possible fear gear over Dinacarl's actions.
I doubt Mazam is trying to insulate himself from anything or TMO for that matter. We have a history built up since the rules changed of working out our problems in a timely manner and will continue to do so. We are trying to find a reasonable solution for what happened. You are the one that keeps raging out and coming up with theories of people's motives that are as I said wild.
Answer one simple question for me Chest. What did BDA lose that was meaningful that needs to be replaced ? You seem to think TMO as a whole needs to lose something meaningful for the actions of one player then by all means lets make it equal to what you lost. So tell us what you lost...besides your temper again.
06-07-2014, 01:45 PM
Hybrid Mode
