What's the story on Avatars and Signatures?

[Fett]

Looks guys, I've had a change of heart and I think I have an even better solution.

Let's just all change our sigs to pictures of boobs. That way the people who want see boobs will be happy (more boobs!) and the people that don't want to see boobs won't feel left out when they disable forum signatures. EVERBODY WINS.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Fett [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Looks guys, I've had a change of heart and I think I have an even better solution.

Let's just all change our sigs to pictures of boobs. That way the people who want see boobs will be happy (more boobs!) and the people that don't want to see boobs won't feel left out when they disable forum signatures. EVERBODY WINS.

You may be okay with not seeing the boobs but then you will feel left out when the trannys on these forums show pictures of their junk.

[webrunner5]

I think one of the "Boobs" on here is HippoNipple.

[Vermicelli]

Ain't a chest- or bottom-side nazi, but yeah. I have thought the general forums to be hella erotic in the last year. Whether or not OP is wasting meaningless corporate dollars, plz fix

[Xer0]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm just going to leave this here... pay special attention to Avatar/Sig, Content section.

[myriverse]

Nothing explicitly NSFW about any avatars or sigs I've seen.

[Xer0]

Im pretty sure things that go beyond suggestive into blatantly sexual are considered NSFW.. it doesnt have to be a moneyshot for someone in the professional world to be like "wtf is that about". Scantily clad women making suggestive motions will do the trick just fine.

Mind you he never explicitly stated no nudity or hardcore pornography.. his words were to keep things work-safe. If he wanted no porn/nudity specifically he would say no porn/nudity. NSFW is pretty well generally understood by well adjusted adults the internet over to include evocative and suggestive images.

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Xer0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im pretty sure things that go beyond suggestive into blatantly sexual are considered NSFW.. it doesnt have to be a moneyshot for someone in the professional world to be like "wtf is that about". Scantily clad women making suggestive motions will do the trick just fine.

Mind you he never explicitly stated no nudity or hardcore pornography.. his words were to keep things work-safe. If he wanted no porn/nudity specifically he would say no porn/nudity. NSFW is pretty well generally understood by well adjusted adults the internet over to include evocative and suggestive images.

You see worse during the "family hour" on network tv than anything I've seen in a avatar or sig on these boards.

[Gaffin 7.0]

pity reply

[Swish]

Rule lawyering on sigs now, o hai P99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]