![]() |
|
#151
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
why would they agree to anything at all, its the same for them either way lol. this is some bullshit. SHUT IT DOWN! fu eqmac | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#152
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#153
|
|||||
|
Quote:
People who circumvent the new rules as a guild to sate their pixel lust should and will be banned. Nothing is stopping people from having multiple characters in multiple guilds, but when a single guild tries to make another alt guild to raid with, I will enjoy seeing it and their main guild immediately banned.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#154
|
||||
|
Quote:
The GMs already said that keeping track of everyone's alt is not practical from their end and it is not going to happen. To demand an equal share of the proposed bag limit points, do you just need enough members to theoretically tackle a raid target? Three or Four groups of level 60s should be able to take the majority of these targets down. Place that many alts in a pre-existing Tier C guild, bam - that's a raid guild and deserves an equal share of the bag limit points. | |||
|
Last edited by sanforce; 12-31-2013 at 11:00 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#155
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Baalzy - 57 Gnocro, Baalz - 36 Ikscro, Adra - 51 Hileric, Fatbag Ofcrap - 25 halfuid Red99 Baalz Less - Humger, Baalzy - Ikscro If MMORPG players were around when God said, "Let there be light" they'd have called the light gay, and plunged the universe back into darkness by squatting their nutsacks over it. Picture courtesy of azeth | |||
|
|
||||
|
#156
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't need raid content to be nostalgic. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#157
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#158
|
||||
|
Quote:
Surely the staff didn't mean for it to go this far? This is laughable.
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#159
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#160
|
|||
|
IB = FE for all intents and purposes. If you raid together, then you get lumped into a single alliance.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|