Science Admits They Made Up Everything About the Big Bang

[Langrisserx]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Universe_from_Nothing

A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather than Nothing is a book by physicist Lawrence M. Krauss, first published in 2012, discussing various scientific ideas related to cosmogony.

it is a small book, but, unlike your small brain, is useful.

r00t = fgt /confirmed

[JayN]

no such thing as nothing ya morans!

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

"It is both necessary and true to think and to say being is. It is impossible and false to think and to say nothing is."

-- Parmenides of Eletea, 5th century bc

[runlvlzero]

Our universe is just a bubble in a bigger universe. The universe is bounded by other universes.

Nassim Harrimen figured this out and did a lot of good work on that b4 he went nuts.

Look up the flower of life.

[kylok]

That's possible, but also impossible to prove.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's possible, but also impossible to prove.

It's good you continue to claim knowledge on what is not possible to prove.

[kylok]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's good you continue to claim knowledge on what is not possible to prove.

Provide the evidence of interactions beyond the "boundaries" of our universe and I will gladly recant my statement. Everything I've ever learned about physics tells me that if you can't directly, or indirectly observe and interaction with "something" then you can not accurately say whether it is, or is not there - you simply don't know.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Provide the evidence of interactions beyond the "boundaries" of our universe and I will gladly recant my statement. Everything I've ever learned about physics tells me that if you can't directly, or indirectly observe and interaction with "something" then you can not accurately say whether it is, or is not there - you simply don't know.

I'm not saying we currently have the technological means to gather such evidence. But to claim that we never will seems rather ignorant.

[kylok]

an*

[kylok]

*currently impossible to prove. My mistake.