Best trio to self farm gear/dungeons

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who said a trio with two showers is bad? You doing strawman again?

You did:

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Having two showing classes is a waste of space in this trio.

That is a pretty clear statement, and includes 2 Enchanters. They both have slow. Would you like to clarify?

[Lampolo]

Do you drool?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you drool?

Thank you for admitting defeat. Please try again when you have a more salient argument than "two 'showing' classes are bad in a trio".

[Lampolo]

Sorry enchanters don't need shamans to slow. Hope you can recover some day

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry enchanters don't need shamans to slow. Hope you can recover some day

Enchanters don't need Clerics to heal either. You can simply break the pet and let it heal out of combat, then recharm.

The question isn't "do you need a Shaman to slow?". The question is "can you be more efficient at killing mobs by sharing duties?". The answer to that question is yes.

Healing a charmed pet is simply a faster way of healing the pet than breaking and recharming. You are asking the Cleric to do that duty so the Enchanter doesn't have to.

Having the Shaman slow is simply doing the exact same thing the Cleric is doing: spending time and mana to mitigate damage so the Enchanter doesn't have to.

[Lampolo]

Trust me you don't know what the question is

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trust me you don't know what the question is

Thank you for admitting defeat. You cannot rebut any of my arguments, and must resort to insults to try and save face. This will be my last response to you until you can provide a better argument.

[Lampolo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enchanters don't need Clerics to heal either. You can simply break the pet and let it heal, then recharm.

The question isn't "do you need a Shaman to slow?". The question is "can you be more efficient by sharing duties?". The answer to that question is yes.

Healing a charmed pet is simply a faster way of healing the pet than breaking and rechamring.

Having the Shaman slow is simply doing the exact same thing a Cleric is doing: spending time and mana to mitigate damage instead of the Enchanter.

Thank you for admitting defeat

[BigPlays]

Regarding rez, I personally rather have Rez on hand then wait for a cleric to come to where you are and spend 500 pp of pp that could go to gear. Losing exp at say lv 57 is not fun

[Snaggles]

Yea in the game of risk v reward having 96% or even 90% rezzes on tap is very helpful. An enchanter and shaman toolkits have enough overlap that unless you absolutely need malo a cleric is simply better.