Quote:
Originally Posted by loopholbrook
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
To pickled_heretic I noticed that when I trumped you, you just ignored me. Just to clarify that the majority sees no need to change, I went through every page and here is a list of who wants change and who doesn't want change.
For change: 1. Aruden 2. pickled_heretic 3. xshayla701 4. mitic 5. Samoht
Against change: 1.Nilbog 2. Truth 3. Knuckle 4. purest 5. Diggles 6. Supreme 7. bionicbadger 8. Loopholbrook 9. Lazortag 10. Humerox 11. Uthgaard 12. Karrmer 13. Hasbinbad 14. doors 15. Grahm 16. Vinicito 17. Rust1d 18. Barkingturtle 19. Glitch 20. Hailto 21. dcapotos 22. Szeth 23. Maurk 24. Kornaki 25. Autotune
In conclusion, this thread has a 5:1 ratio for no change. That's an overwhelming majority of people who think that five people on the server are butt hurt. Name stays, /thread.
|
You didn't trump anything. This thread has been a resounding success from my perspective, from Uthgaard grammar nazi self-owning himself completely out of the thread, to softening positions of some of the more intelligent detractors (such as Lazortag) who have posted here. I largely consider the "U SUK QQ MOAR NOOB" posts to be irrelevant and I have ignored them.
Objectively speaking, the majority is irrelevant to guild naming policy. the only people's opinions who matter are Nilbog's, Rogean's, and whoever else is responsible for the guild naming policy on this server. Just because they currently don't agree with my perspective doesn't mean that they can't be persuaded. From a "classic" perspective I'm pretty sure a guild name like this would have
never made it on live. What other criteria do they use?