SK Race Choice

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey, you didn't need to respond to my post to begin with. Put me on ignore and be done with it. I think you just want the attention though, don't you?

I'm pretty secure in the knowledge that, apart from bcbrown (who is just self-righteous like you), nobody is going to think that when they read that thread. You're reaching now.

I do not put anyone on ignore. I have hope that everybody will redeem themselves, including yourself.

You also do not need to keep posting off topic nonsense for no reason. That is why I am asking you to stop.

You have contributed nothing to this thread, and nobody cares about your delusions regarding other threads.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

Well, why not? If I'm a "troll". You're just lying.

"Redeem themselves"? Do you honestly not see how utterly self-righteous this comment is? It's overflowing with hypocrisy and holier than thou arrogance.

You don't need to ask me to stop -- you can just stop replying.

Edit: Nice stealth edit. What "delusions"? ROFL! Okay...

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, why not? If I'm a "troll". You're just lying.

"Redeem themselves"? Do you honestly not see how utterly self-righteous this comment is? It's overflowing with hypocrisy and holier than thou arrogance.

You don't need to ask me to stop -- you can just stop replying.

Trolling other threads with delusional nonsense is not helping anybody. That is why you should stop. I am not sure why you got so hurt by a 20 year old elf sim thread, but I feel sorry for you.

[Gloomlord]

The mask is beginning to fall off your face, DSM. The power of the lie has its limits, afterall.

You go from saying "redeem themselves" to saying "I'm not sure why you got hurt by a 20 year old elf sim". Not to mention throwing out "delusions" without one explanation as to what that is about.

It's such a shame you'll never admit you just exposed yourself.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The mask is beginning to fall off your face, DSM. The power of the lie has its limits, afterall.

You go from saying "redeem themselves" to saying "I'm not sure why you got hurt by a 20 year old elf sim". Not to mention throwing out "delusions" without one explanation as to what that is about.

It's such a shame you'll never admit you just exposed yourself.

This will be my last reply to you in this thread. It is clear you are not going to discuss the topic at hand, and your delusional ramblings are getting worse.

The only thing I can do is ask you to stop. I have done so multiple times. You are not helping anybody, including yourself.

I believe you can change your ways, and will continue to hope that it happens.

[Gloomlord]

DSM, you're clearly a troll. Whether it's a defence mechanism from your ego getting popped, or whether it's from mere sadism, it doesn't matter. I'm glad you've basically admitted this with your post.

Game, Set, Match.

[Jimjam]

Just going back to mr turtle. Generally the hit size distributions are normal. That means bell shaped (2/3 of the hit amounts occur close to the middle and values further from the most common become increasingly rare).

When attack and mitigation match then the height of the curve manifests at the central value, meaning few hits of min or max value.

2d10 gives a fair approximation of normally distributed di 1-20 (the value for 1 is actually missing for this model, but it is close). By this model there is about 1% chance to hit for max (rolling two tens is a 1-100 chance. Compare that to the number of ways of making the most common result - an 11- 1,10.2,9.3,8.4,7.5,6 and so on - 10/100: a 10% chance).

If, as you report, you are scoring 11% max hits on the turtle, you are performing like ten times better than you would on mobs that mitigate normally. I wonder if that was the frequency of your max hit, how frequent were your minimum hits?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just going back to mr turtle. Generally the hit size distributions are normal. That means bell shaped (2/3 of the hit amounts occur close to the middle and values further from the most common become increasingly rare).

When attack and mitigation match then the height of the curve manifests at the central value, meaning few hits of min or max value.

2d10 gives a fair approximation of normally distributed di 1-20 (the value for 1 is actually missing for this model, but it is close). By this model there is about 1% chance to hit for max (rolling two tens is a 1-100 chance. Compare that to the number of ways of making the most common result - an 11- 1,10.2,9.3,8.4,7.5,6 and so on - 10/100: a 10% chance).

If, as you report, you are scoring 11% max hits on the turtle, you are performing like ten times better than you would on mobs that mitigate normally. I wonder if that was the frequency of your max hit, how frequent were your minimum hits?

I think you posted in the wrong thread? I also didn't say I got 11% max hits on the turtle, so I am not sure what you are talking about. It was 2.2% on the 2H test.

[Jimjam]

Yes i made a whoopsie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]