![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I don't understand why anyone is arguing about DPS. A group with multiple charm pets is not lacking DPS. Mages are useful at fungi king to coth players as you swap out. That's about it
| ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
The mage is there to malo and provide a beefy pet to tank when charm breaks, which with 2 enchanters is doubly valuable. The utility is also non-trivial while overall DPS is not significantly lower than 3x chanter. | |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-20-2022 at 09:18 PM..
| ||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Mage offers much less than a shaman here. But shaman offers much less than a cleric or necro. Stuns/screaming terror more utility than Malo.
Multiple charm breaks will happen simultaneously, more assistance is better than a bit of dps | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
DSM is basically UCF
| ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
![]() |
|
|