Any good guides for GINA?

[Niedar]

Parsing existed in 1999, showing UI elements existed in 1999. Sorry to say, GINA is classic, what is your proof its not?

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by Niedar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Parsing existed in 1999, showing UI elements existed in 1999. Sorry to say, GINA is classic, what is your proof its not?

Burden of proof is not on my shoulders. If you can make a forum posts several times to troll it is then you can easily take a moment to prove it.

Sorry you suck, Charlie Sheen.

[Niedar]

Originally Posted by Mblake81 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Burden of proof is not on my shoulders. If you can make a forum posts several times to troll it is then you can easily take a moment to prove it.

Sorry you suck, Charlie Sheen.

Of course the burden of proof is on your shoulders, GINA is classic by default. Prove its not.

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by Niedar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course the burden of proof is on your shoulders, GINA is classic by default. Prove its not.

Prove it is, troll.

[kylok]

Given that the current rule is that GINA is allowed it does seem that the burden of proof is upon the players wishing to change that.

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Given that the current rule is that GINA is allowed it does seem that the burden of proof is upon the players wishing to change that.

I don't wish to change it. I haven't stated the devs should take it or requested that they do.

I just asked if it did, people became defensive. Blood is in the water.

[kylok]

I don't use this program, or any log parsing program, I don't care if they're allowed or not. Given what other folks on both sides have presented in terms of evidence it's looking like a stalemate. Seems like the current rule should stand? If this were a bug report nothing would be changed....

[dekova]

Guys, let's keep it civil.

I'd like to ask you guys to look at this a slightly different way...

I think we can all agree that reading and displaying log information provides an advantage, yes? So then, given that the technology existed in 1999, and was simple enough for some Junior programmer with 6 months of experience to implement, how many months or years do you think it would have taken for someone to do so?

[kylok]

Imo it would take no more than a week for a competent programmer to implement something like this, in a rudimentary form.

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by dekova [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Guys, let's keep it civil.

I'd like to ask you guys to look at this a slightly different way...

I think we can all agree that reading and displaying log information provides an advantage, yes? So then, given that the technology existed in 1999, and was simple enough for some Junior programmer with 6 months of experience to implement, how many months or years do you think it would have taken for someone to do so?

Dunno, I would check to see when GINA first released. hmm. (didn't see a specific release date on first look through)

but,

GINA is developed using Microsoft's .Net Framework 4.0, so you will be prompted to install that during the GINA setup if it is not already installed.

Microsoft framework 4.0 release date February 13, 2002

.NET Framework 4.0 is supported on Windows XP (with Service Pack 3), Windows Server 2003, Vista, Server 2008, 7 and Server 2008 R2. Applications utilizing .NET Framework 4.0 will also run on computers with .NET Framework 4.5 or 4.6 installed, which supports additional operating systems. .NET Framework 4.0 is the last version to support Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.