NET NUTRALITY REPEAL CELEBRATION THREAD

[maskedmelon]

every time I see someone going hard at a puppet, I assume they the same. nevertheless I am haunted by the possibility they are not.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

every time I see someone going hard at a puppet, I assume they the same. nevertheless I am haunted by the possibility they are not.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, you can't cite it. Got it.

I can say that I own the moon, but it doesn't make it true. I know this is more nuanced than Red Fish Blue Fish, so please tell me if I lose you.

NN supporters are not stating that a Title II classification is the best solution. There are some valid (if not weaker) arguments against it from a Constitutional perspective. Nor are we opposed to statewide regulations if they are allowed to stand against preemption. Most NN supports feel that the best solution is direct congressional legislation that all data must be treated equally.

But, you're not seeing that. You're just jacking off about "NN = CENSORSHIP" without even understanding how or why it works.

"Because I said so" isn't how the law works. I know that's what your dad says when you need to eat your vegetables or when its Goofy Time, but that doesn't fly for civil authority.

If you're going to tell me that NN, as it was enacted, allows the Federal government carte blanche to censor websites, you'll need to cite the exact rule or law that allows it to do so.

And until you do that: Do Not Pass Go. Do Not Collect $200.

Don't respond seriously to mick. He's unemployed

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, you can't cite it. Got it.

I can say that I own the moon, but it doesn't make it true.

lmao your entire premise for needing NN is because some evil corporation *mmiiiight* try to throttle websites.

if you spent half your energy trying to make sure your state had healthy regulation, instead of trying to convince me that you're right about a decision that a) has already been made b) didnt care what you or I thought about it anyway, you might have a protected internet.

But instead you'd rather just kick rocks.

[Patriam1066]

Remember when only people with property could vote? Ah, simpler times!

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh, I know. im sure I'll feel it when you do (o^^o)

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember when only people with property could vote? Ah, simpler times!

you do realize republicans own more land than democrats and you're arguing with me.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you do realize republicans own more land than democrats and you're arguing with me.

I own land and you don't is my point

My good chum!

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember when only people with property could vote? Ah, simpler times!

not a bad place to start. Not great, but not awful neither. homeless should have no vote. neither should anyone with a negative or neutral tax burden. Couple with a 90% inherritence tax on estates greater than the 90th wealth percentile and we be good.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not a bad place to start. Not great, but not awful neither. homeless should have no vote. neither should anyone with a negative or neutral tax burden. Couple with a 90% inherritence tax on estates greater than the 90th wealth percentile and we be good.

I'll be passing 100% of my wealth on and anyone who says otherwise can speak to my friends Smith and Wesson