Merriam-Webster Word of the Year 2017

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What society ever functioned that way lol?

Mao would send bureaucrats out to the countryside if they were getting too conservative or acting stuck up/snobby ("putting on airs").

Of course intellectuals decry this as horrible -- I thought it was great.

Seriously -- why prison instead of labor? It's stupid. Rape in prisons being allowed is stupid. Useless lumps sitting around stabbing each other because they have nothing else to do is stupid.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mao would send bureaucrats out to the countryside if they were getting too conservative or acting stuck up/snobby ("putting on airs").

Of course intellectuals decry this as horrible -- I thought it was great.

Seriously -- why prison instead of labor? It's stupid. Rape in prisons being allowed is stupid. Useless lumps sitting around stabbing each other because they have nothing else to do is stupid.

Hmmm

How long would it take to be called slavery if we took our predominantly black prison population and made them pick crops? I don't disagree that he prison system is a joke I'm simply saying communism has never worked and never will. Incremental progress should be the goal

[fash]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Communist societies put more emphasis on everyone putting in their share of labor. They would make sure rich people spend time pick fruit if they put on airs -- labor as punishment is a much better idea than prison IMO.

And the best part is when there isn't enough fruit to go around, you can sell human body parts for food.

NSFW pics of communists: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ved-death.html

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look...everyone knows illegal aliens don't account for what was it?

Oh yes, "72% of Drug Possession"

So the jig is up isn't it? These are obviously just reflections of conviction rates -- which are highly influenced by how policing and due process is done.

try to say the exact same thing, but about the murder statistic and what you would be suggesting is that white affluent people are literally getting away with murder.

1. do the police arrest more minorities for drugs than whites? maybe, maybe that number should be down to 50%?
2. do the police arrest more minorities for murder? yes. Is that because they are letting white people get away with murder? no.

Illegal immigrants just commit more murder than non illegal immigrants and native born Americans. They also, still, if you lower that 72% by 50% STILL make up for MORE drug possession than white people.

Sorry! next.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

try to say the exact same thing, but about the murder statistic and what you would be suggesting is that white affluent people are literally getting away with murder.

1. do the police arrest more minorities for drugs than whites? maybe, maybe that number should be down to 50%?
2. do the police arrest more minorities for murder? yes. Is that because they are letting white people get away with murder? no.

Illegal immigrants just commit more murder than non illegal immigrants and native born Americans. They also, still, if you lower that 72% by 50% STILL make up for MORE drug possession than white people.

Sorry! next.

Well who the fuck is going to murder someone if they live in Beverly Hills?* Obviously we should at very least -- control for income when determining if immigrants are more dangerous.

*Probably some guy killing illegal hookers and getting away with it.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well who the fuck is going to murder someone if they live in Beverly Hills?* Obviously we should at very least -- control for income when determining if immigrants are more dangerous.

*Probably some guy killing illegal hookers and getting away with it.

uhhhh marlon brando's son christian brando for starters


what now bitch


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...o#Legal_issues

[AzzarTheGod]

720

[loramin]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

uhhhh marlon brando's son christian brando for starters


what now bitch


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...o#Legal_issues

Do we know that his grandson didn't kill hookers? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/duck

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well who the fuck is going to murder someone if they live in Beverly Hills?* Obviously we should at very least -- control for income when determining if immigrants are more dangerous.

*Probably some guy killing illegal hookers and getting away with it.

look we could debate WHY illegal immigrants commit more crime than non illegal immigrants till the cows come home.

Doesn't change the fact that illegal immigrants commit more crime than non illegal immigrants.

Unfortunately there are millions of reasons why they commit more crimes. And it is impossible to just fix it, in anyway political way at all.

The only way to reduce crime in America, by illegal immigrants, is to not let illegal immigrants into the country, or give them a pass for committing crime.

Immigrants in Germany make up more crime than natural born citizens there. Why? Because the people immigrating are coming from countries that have VASTLY different cultural values on the crimes... They also feel segregated, they also are angry. I bring up germany because they do everything that libcucks want to do with immigrants, make them legal, give them housing, accept them with open arms.. however the crime rates are the same.

We have poor people in this country that are trying to get by, but when you inject a bunch of criminals into those areas, it makes it even harder to get by.

The only reliable solution, end illegal immigration.

It is NOT racist to say, "if you are going to come here, learn how to live here and do so legally"

*also, using the word probubly to defend your argument means you have no clue what you are talking about at all*

[Patriam1066]

It's time for a national minimum income, balanced budget, halved military budget, and ZERO net immigration legal or otherwise

The exception being tall blondes from Eastern Europe of above average IQ