![]() |
|
#143
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#144
|
|||
|
depending on the size of the array, and the raid configuration (1,4,5,etc), usually 1 dead disk wont take down the server. it would take multiple disks to fail before it would take down the server, which gives you a chance to replace failed disks before it has an impact.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#145
|
|||
|
I appreciate the updates and hard work. Cyber high-five!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#146
|
||||
|
Quote:
My guess is the card itself died since the data is still intact according to Rogean. New cards range from 10 to 3000 dollars. #donate http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16816124009 low end http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...9SIA67S2FB5169 higher end http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...9SIA67S2985740 enterprise end If he can find an exact replacement, should be back up tonight. If he needs a different model, might take half a day. | |||
|
Last edited by Wisteso; 05-25-2015 at 09:26 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#147
|
|||
|
Or it could be like the server where I work where nobody noticed the nagging alert that a disk had failed in a raid 5 array until a second disk in that array also failed. (about 1 year after the first failure)
However, since there's no data loss I'll go with the 'failed card' guess. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|