Raid Suspension: TMO (Again)

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dont forget GM timers

How could I forget that ?

[Pint]

You guys all relax, asgard is totally ready to clean up VP this weekend, nobody needs to worry about ib getting more pixels than usual.

[Nuktari]

Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You guys all relax, asgard is totally ready to clean up VP this weekend, nobody needs to worry about ib getting more pixels than usual.

Time to get me a Crown of Rile!

[wycca]

Consistency in rule violations is certainly a problem. Really need to approach it like judiciary rulings than off-the-cuff changes-week-to-week. Really frustrating.

AT breaks bag limit = 2 week raid suspension
TMO violates by 27sec = 1 week raid suspension
IB breaks bag limit = no punishment

Anyone else troubled by the new Gore ruling? Anytime you accidentally get FTE on a mob (even if its immediately dropped) you get a punishment. Certainly going to make moving through Dreadlands more interesting when Gore is up.

Precedents are set and changed from week to week. That's the main problem.

[Pint]

Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone else troubled by the new Gore ruling? Anytime you accidentally get FTE on a mob (even if its immediately dropped) you get a punishment. Certainly going to make moving through Dreadlands more interesting when Gore is up.

We (asgard) actually had a 60 sk log into the lair on naggy spawn thinking he was going to get to watch the fight and end up with the fte and lair boot, thats kind of the same thing. I'm not sure tmo or ib bothered petitioning it but we certainly want to earn our class C stripes with our first raid suspension so feel free to submit a case.

[Cecily]

Accidental FTEs shouldn't be considered a violation if they don't result in a pull attempt. Like that Gore we forfeited. And that rogue wasn't a tracker or a puller. Dumb. It's just dumb.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Accidental FTEs shouldn't be considered a violation if they don't result in a pull attempt. Like that Gore we forfeited. And that rogue wasn't a tracker or a puller. Dumb. It's just dumb.

The thing is, how is a GM supposed to know the difference?

[VANVEM]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Accidental FTEs shouldn't be considered a violation if they don't result in a pull attempt. Like that Gore we forfeited. And that rogue wasn't a tracker or a puller. Dumb. It's just dumb.

Wrong! there are no accidents, you played badly for whatever reason, and your mistake probably interferred with someone else's FTE attempt, so YES it should be punishable

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by VANVEM [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrong! there are no accidents, you played badly for whatever reason, and your mistake probably interferred with someone else's FTE attempt, so YES it should be punishable

You obviously don't play the same game I do, so refrain from speaking at me you miserable peon.

[quido]

GMs used to admit to making decisions to level the playing field. They likely won't admit it anymore, but good luck convincing me otherwise.