PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.project1999.org/forums/mi...osted&t=113050

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only 1 guild bound there

Read only 1 guild exploiting raid zone

Also read only 1 guild disobeying gm and staff decisions

Actually multiple founding father clerics are bound in fear currently and this was used by lethdar / letsjoe / cast / friedchicken / node / abysal / hollix / tibberz / Selena for months after the patch. Nice try come again.

[p-niner]

Eho Who cares about fear

Damn your retarded

[Something'Witty]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only 1 guild bound there

Read only 1 guild exploiting raid zone

Also read only 1 guild disobeying gm and staff decisions

But I thought the GMs only did stuff to help that one guild? I am so confused now...

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Eho Who cares about fear

Damn your retarded

Because if this is an exploit it was used for an unfair advantage to avoid having to break into fear and to wipe other guilds in fear by binding on top of the north wall. But since those players who did this didn't have nihilum tags I guess it was ok amirite? Your logic isn't consistent.

[p-niner]

So your saying fear is an unbindable raid zone?

[Nirgon]

No more invis pulling in perma with gate and shit, stfu

[heartbrand]

Correct. I've never stated despite your poor reading comp that these aren't unbindable raid zones. Just that the intention and ruling by amelinda at the time was that those with the bind point need not change it. If Sirken has decided to now amend that rule that's fine, though I think we should reexamine the need for the rule to begin with and contemplate either removing it altogether or expanding it for the reasons I've written prior. However, calling it retroactively an exploit doesn't logically make sense to me, it's simply an argument of semantics with no real in game implications.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No more invis pulling in perma with gate and shit, stfu

Yet you had no problem "exploiting" this with our fear bound clerics big nirdawg. Gotta love the hypocrisy of the boards

[p-niner]

Amelinda said no need to honor rule and rebind? Heresay. Where is exhibit A?

Are you just saying fear is an unbindable raid zone or is this documented somewhere? Are you trying to bind yourself right now to verify? SS?