Chira numbuh wan!

[Ekco]

yeah it's pretty insane the 14th amendment extends to corporations, and that citizens united shit only made it worse

[shovelquest]

Would be cool if democrats took this opportunity to say "good idea trump, let's also roll back these things that we've been saying are corrupt"

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How about making a claim to fight white racism? The orange man just stated this too.

The Orange man just signed an executive order to give refugees status to white people.

He basically says that the government of South Africa is illegally taking land and property from the ethical minority (White People)

In the executive order he talks about how the government of South Africa is dismantling programs aimed at opportunity in employment, education, and business.

Can you imagine a government that would dismantle these programs that would take away the equal opportunity of employment in education and business.

The Orange man is very upset that South Africa is doing this, and he signed and executive order giving refugee status to any White person affected by this in Africa.

The guy who ran his entire campaign on hurting refugees in America just signed an executive order to make white people refugees.

Now how does the Orange man know what's happening in South Africa?
Why is he so concerned about what's happening in South Africa?

Because the Elon is concerned about it.

Worse the Orange man literally talks about it in his executive order how it is egregious that South Africa is dismantling these programs to create equal opportunity, WHEN HE IS DOING THAT SAME THING HERE!

And if you say well yeah white racism exists there. This means you orange voters understands that diversity and inclusion in America is necessary to stop white supremacy. You know when one ethnic group with the majority of power removes equality from others it is wrong.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so we'd basically have the same libel laws as Europe, the place the left is always saying is far superior to the US, up until 5 minutes ago when they also starting fighting back against gender affirming care for minors and other things.

i wonder what the polls would say is the approval / disapproval of this.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-This could lead to erosion of press protections overturning this decision could weaken the First Amendment protections for the press, making it easier for public figures to win defamation cases.

-This could threaten investigative journalism like it has in European laws, this change could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, as media outlets might avoid publishing critical stories out of fear of legal consequences.

-Holding public figures accountable for their actions is a key role of the media. Weakening press protections could lead to reduced accountability and transparency. Destroying the narrative with money is just a free pass for pushing propaganda.

-A free and robust press is essential for a healthy democracy. Limiting the press's ability to report freely could negatively impact public discourse and the public's right to know.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh here we go, everything western is white supremacy.

We just proved that literally what you said was expanding christian religion was a reaction to a genocidal expansion of the islamic theocracy.

And you go straight to, oh ok well, white people as a whole are colonizers!

Aliens taking over... Christen whites colonizing... What are you about?

Edit: Nevermind it isn't worth it.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What are you about?

I give up, you dont listen you cant listen and you are a racist.

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

-This could lead to erosion of press protections overturning this decision could weaken the First Amendment protections for the press, making it easier for public figures to win defamation cases.

-This could threaten investigative journalism like it has in European laws, this change could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, as media outlets might avoid publishing critical stories out of fear of legal consequences.

-Holding public figures accountable for their actions is a key role of the media. Weakening press protections could lead to reduced accountability and transparency. Destroying the narrative with money is just a free pass for pushing propaganda.

-A free and robust press is essential for a healthy democracy. Limiting the press's ability to report freely could negatively impact public discourse and the public's right to know.

the press is already 100% captured by the companies that buy ads or just straight up owned by oligarchs now

everything your lighting your hair on fire about should of been dealt with 20+ fucking years ago, the war is over my dude

there needs to be a dr.strange love movie but instead of nukes it's the cyberpunk technocracy timeline we're on, so "stop worrying and love the AI CEO Overlords"

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

stop worrying and love the AI CEO Overlords

I wonder if after doge gets rid of a lot of these departments if their intention is to rehire young AI people to run them. Keeping up with the latest in Ai.

Would be nuts if they add "with an integrated link connecting them all!" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seems like a stretch, but I'd say what's happening now I thought would have been a stretch.

[Ekco]

probably, all kids who have doge coin also lol

his algo at X prolly ranks them based on how many posts of his they like and he'll pick from the top

like i literally don't give a shit what these kids motivation is, pump shitcoins i don't give a fuck, it's better than 80 year olds making laws about how the internet works.


think this is the clip, the one boomer who knew even in the slightest wtf was going on and the importance of cyber warfare and the government getting up to speed, was also the actor in hunt for red October as the admiral lol
edit:
Freddie Dalton Thompson

15 years later congress people were saying the most cringe shit possible and asking zuckerberg and others the dumbest fucking questions about cell phones and other things

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Orange man just signed an executive order to give refugees status to white people.

He basically says that the government of South Africa is illegally taking land and property from the ethical minority (White People)

In the executive order he talks about how the government of South Africa is dismantling programs aimed at opportunity in employment, education, and business.

Can you imagine a government that would dismantle these programs that would take away the equal opportunity of employment in education and business.

The Orange man is very upset that South Africa is doing this, and he signed and executive order giving refugee status to any White person affected by this in Africa.

The guy who ran his entire campaign on hurting refugees in America just signed an executive order to make white people refugees.

Now how does the Orange man know what's happening in South Africa?
Why is he so concerned about what's happening in South Africa?

Because the Elon is concerned about it.

Worse the Orange man literally talks about it in his executive order how it is egregious that South Africa is dismantling these programs to create equal opportunity, WHEN HE IS DOING THAT SAME THING HERE!

And if you say well yeah white racism exists there. This means you orange voters understands that diversity and inclusion in America is necessary to stop white supremacy. You know when one ethnic group with the majority of power removes equality from others it is wrong.

This gives a combined total of 256 seats for parties with socialist or socialist-leaning ideologies out of 400 seats in the National Assembly.

Do Socialist or Socialist-Leaning Parties Have a Majority?
Yes, with a combined total of 256 seats, these parties do have a majority in the National Assembly, as this exceeds the 201 seats needed for a simple majority.

ANC and EFF are confiscating land. America does not cotton to that type of thing.