the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[starkind]

That is a really cute alien even if its going to get its legs broke. All that matters is its cuteness)

[unsunghero]

Capital police are investigating this incident because it is a clear violation of his 4th amendment rights against illegal search and seizures

Police are not allowed to just enter someone’s home and take a bunch of pictures just because their door happened to be open. They can only enter for a welfare check of someone’s safety, and then only to perform that function. In this incident they could try to argue that they had suspicion that a crime occurred that they were trying to document by taking pictures

I personally would sue them in court. Because they would not be able to prove to jury that the reasonable explanation for a door being open is that a robbery just occurred versus the person just accidentally left the door open. For suspicion of something like a robbery there would need to be more evidence such as damage to the door, belongings strewn about in the room, etc

He should sue, based on what I learned about police procedures from the ATA channel, he would likely win the case

[unsunghero]

Lol Russians gonna Russia

[Gravydoo II]

A Republican lawmaker Elijah Benhke was caught on video recently saying that he is encouraging Republicans to "cheat like the Democrats do" and "bend the rules" to win elections in the future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69_z...=TheRingofFire

DOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Capital police are investigating this incident because it is a clear violation of his 4th amendment rights against illegal search and seizures

Police are not allowed to just enter someone’s home and take a bunch of pictures just because their door happened to be open. They can only enter for a welfare check of someone’s safety, and then only to perform that function. In this incident they could try to argue that they had suspicion that a crime occurred that they were trying to document by taking pictures

I personally would sue them in court. Because they would not be able to prove to jury that the reasonable explanation for a door being open is that a robbery just occurred versus the person just accidentally left the door open. For suspicion of something like a robbery there would need to be more evidence such as damage to the door, belongings strewn about in the room, etc

He should sue, based on what I learned about police procedures from the ATA channel, he would likely win the case

One question though. Is his office owned by him or the state? If its public owned, accessible to the public, like most government buildings are, its not really his to say then.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...al-equity.html

So it turns out this was complete bullshit, Fox News viewers lack of critical thinking strikes yet again.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So it turns out this was complete bullshit, Fox News viewers lack of critical thinking strikes yet again.

No, it was "fact checked" which, as usual, means some biased group of partisan hacks didn't like it and found some technicality why it's "mostly untrue!".

See, it's also doing a bunch of other things, it's not ONLY handing out crack pipes. And the goal isn't for racial equity PRIMARILY, it's to "prevent infection" (what?), but racial equity is still a background concern. This is literally what they said about it themselves.

So yeah, I guess it's "mostly untrue"!

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So it turns out this was complete bullshit, Fox News viewers lack of critical thinking strikes yet again.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...pes/ar-AATE0r8

Attachment 16900

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One question though. Is his office owned by him or the state? If its public owned, accessible to the public, like most government buildings are, its not really his to say then.

Ya that might be the difference, not sure

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, it was "fact checked" which, as usual, means some biased group of partisan hacks didn't like it and found some technicality why it's "mostly untrue!".

See, it's also doing a bunch of other things, it's not ONLY handing out crack pipes. And the goal isn't for racial equity PRIMARILY, it's to "prevent infection" (what?), but racial equity is still a background concern. This is literally what they said about it themselves.

So yeah, I guess it's "mostly untrue"!

That's a lot of words just to say you don't even give a shit if he's a liar, paste eater.